Geriatric fracture centre vs usual care after proximal femur fracture in older patients: what are the benefits? Results of a large international prospective multicentre study

dc.contributor.authorBlauth, Michael
dc.contributor.authorJoeris, Alexander
dc.contributor.authorRometsch, Elke
dc.contributor.authorEspinoza-Rebmann, Kathrin
dc.contributor.authorWattanapanom, Pannida
dc.contributor.authorJarayabhand, Rahat
dc.contributor.authorPoeze, Martijn
dc.contributor.authorWong, Merng K.
dc.contributor.authorKwek, Ernest B. K.
dc.contributor.authorHegeman, Johannes H.
dc.contributor.authorPerez-Uribarri, Carlos
dc.contributor.authorGuerado, Enrique
dc.contributor.authorRevak, Thomas J.
dc.contributor.authorZohner, Sebastian
dc.contributor.authorJoseph, David
dc.contributor.authorGosch, Markus
dc.contributor.authoraffiliation[Blauth, Michael] Med Univ Innsbruck, Dept Trauma Surg & Sports Med, Innsbruck, Austria
dc.contributor.authoraffiliation[Blauth, Michael] Depuy Synthes, Preclin Clin Med, Zuchwil, Switzerland
dc.contributor.authoraffiliation[Joeris, Alexander] AO Fdn, AO Innovat Translat Ctr AOITC, Dubendorf, Switzerland
dc.contributor.authoraffiliation[Rometsch, Elke] AO Fdn, AO Innovat Translat Ctr AOITC, Dubendorf, Switzerland
dc.contributor.authoraffiliation[Espinoza-Rebmann, Kathrin] AO Fdn, AO Innovat Translat Ctr AOITC, Dubendorf, Switzerland
dc.contributor.authoraffiliation[Wattanapanom, Pannida] Bangkok Hosp, Bangkok Longev Ctr, Bangkok, Thailand
dc.contributor.authoraffiliation[Jarayabhand, Rahat] Bhumibol Adulyadej Hosp, Orthoped, Bangkok, Thailand
dc.contributor.authoraffiliation[Poeze, Martijn] Maastricht Univ, Dept Surg, Med Ctr, Maastricht, Netherlands
dc.contributor.authoraffiliation[Wong, Merng K.] Singapore Gen Hosp, Orthoped Surg, Singapore, Singapore
dc.contributor.authoraffiliation[Kwek, Ernest B. K.] Tan Tock Seng Hosp, Orthoped Surg, Singapore, Singapore
dc.contributor.authoraffiliation[Hegeman, Johannes H.] Ziekenhuisgrp Twente Almelo, Trauma, Almelo, Netherlands
dc.contributor.authoraffiliation[Perez-Uribarri, Carlos] Hosp Son Llatzer, Orthoped & Trauma Surg, Palma De Mallorca, Spain
dc.contributor.authoraffiliation[Guerado, Enrique] Univ Malaga, Hosp Univ Costa del Sol, Fac Med, Marbella, Spain
dc.contributor.authoraffiliation[Revak, Thomas J.] St Louis Univ, Div Orthoped Trauma, Dept Orthopaed Surg, St Louis, MO 63103 USA
dc.contributor.authoraffiliation[Zohner, Sebastian] Kepler Univ Klinikum Med Campus III, Klin Unfallchirurg & Sporttraumatol, Linz, Austria
dc.contributor.authoraffiliation[Joseph, David] Elmhurst Hosp Ctr, Orthoped, Elmhurst, NY USA
dc.contributor.authoraffiliation[Gosch, Markus] Paracelsus Univ Nurnberg, Paracelsus Med Privatuniv Geriatrie, Nurnberg, Germany
dc.contributor.funderAO Foundation via the AO Trauma Network
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-07T14:51:54Z
dc.date.available2025-01-07T14:51:54Z
dc.date.issued2021-05-01
dc.description.abstractObjectiveThe aim of this study was to determine the effect of treatment in geriatric fracture centres (GFC) on the incidence of major adverse events (MAEs) in patients with hip fractures compared with usual care centres (UCC). Secondary objectives included hospital-workflow and mobility-related outcomes.DesignCohort study recruiting patients between June 2015 and January 2017. Follow-up was 1year.SettingInternational (six countries, three continents) multicentre study.Participants281 patients aged >= 70 with operatively treated proximal femur fractures.InterventionsTreatment in UCCs (n=139) or GFCs (n=142), that is, interdisciplinary treatment including regular geriatric consultation and daily physiotherapy.Outcome measuresPrimary outcome was occurrence of prespecified MAEs, including delirium. Secondary outcomes included any other adverse events, time to surgery, time in acute ward, 1-year mortality, mobility, and quality of life.ResultsPatients treated in GFCs (n=142) had a mean age of 81.9 (SD, 6.6) years versus 83.9 (SD 6.9) years in patients (n=139) treated in UCCs (p=0.013) and a higher mean Charlson Comorbidity Index of 2.0 (SD, 2.1) versus 1.2 (SD, 1.5) in UCCs (p=0.001). More patients in GFCs (28.2%) experienced an MAE during the first year after surgery compared with UCCs (7.9%) with an OR of 4.56 (95% CI 2.23 to 9.34, p= 70 with operatively treated proximal femur fractures.InterventionsTreatment in UCCs (n=139) or GFCs (n=142), that is, interdisciplinary treatment including regular geriatric consultation and daily physiotherapy.Outcome measuresPrimary outcome was occurrence of prespecified MAEs, including delirium. Secondary outcomes included any other adverse events, time to surgery, time in acute ward, 1-year mortality, mobility, and quality of life.ResultsPatients treated in GFCs (n=142) had a mean age of 81.9 (SD, 6.6) years versus 83.9 (SD 6.9) years in patients (n=139) treated in UCCs (p=0.013) and a higher mean Charlson Comorbidity Index of 2.0 (SD, 2.1) versus 1.2 (SD, 1.5) in UCCs (p=0.001). More patients in GFCs (28.2%) experienced an MAE during the first year after surgery compared with UCCs (7.9%) with an OR of 4.56 (95% CI 2.23 to 9.34, p
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039960
dc.identifier.issn2044-6055
dc.identifier.pmid33972329
dc.identifier.unpaywallURLhttps://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/bmjopen/11/5/e039960.full.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10668/26697
dc.identifier.wosID763644300002
dc.issue.number5
dc.journal.titleBmj open
dc.journal.titleabbreviationBmj open
dc.language.isoen
dc.organizationSAS - Hospital Costa del Sol
dc.publisherBmj publishing group
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subjecttrauma management
dc.subjecthip
dc.subjectgeriatric medicine
dc.subjectorthopaedic & trauma surgery
dc.subjecthealth services administration & management
dc.subjectCongestive-heart-failure
dc.subjectLength-of-stay
dc.subjectHip fracture
dc.subjectOrthogeriatric care
dc.subjectClinical pathway
dc.subjectMortality
dc.subjectQuality
dc.subjectIntervention
dc.subjectManagement
dc.subjectDiagnosis
dc.titleGeriatric fracture centre vs usual care after proximal femur fracture in older patients: what are the benefits? Results of a large international prospective multicentre study
dc.typeresearch article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.volume.number11
dc.wostypeArticle

Files