Geriatric fracture centre vs usual care after proximal femur fracture in older patients: what are the benefits? Results of a large international prospective multicentre study

No Thumbnail Available

Date

2021-05-01

Authors

Blauth, Michael
Joeris, Alexander
Rometsch, Elke
Espinoza-Rebmann, Kathrin
Wattanapanom, Pannida
Jarayabhand, Rahat
Poeze, Martijn
Wong, Merng K.
Kwek, Ernest B. K.
Hegeman, Johannes H.

Advisors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Bmj publishing group
Metrics
Google Scholar
Export

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to determine the effect of treatment in geriatric fracture centres (GFC) on the incidence of major adverse events (MAEs) in patients with hip fractures compared with usual care centres (UCC). Secondary objectives included hospital-workflow and mobility-related outcomes.DesignCohort study recruiting patients between June 2015 and January 2017. Follow-up was 1year.SettingInternational (six countries, three continents) multicentre study.Participants281 patients aged >= 70 with operatively treated proximal femur fractures.InterventionsTreatment in UCCs (n=139) or GFCs (n=142), that is, interdisciplinary treatment including regular geriatric consultation and daily physiotherapy.Outcome measuresPrimary outcome was occurrence of prespecified MAEs, including delirium. Secondary outcomes included any other adverse events, time to surgery, time in acute ward, 1-year mortality, mobility, and quality of life.ResultsPatients treated in GFCs (n=142) had a mean age of 81.9 (SD, 6.6) years versus 83.9 (SD 6.9) years in patients (n=139) treated in UCCs (p=0.013) and a higher mean Charlson Comorbidity Index of 2.0 (SD, 2.1) versus 1.2 (SD, 1.5) in UCCs (p=0.001). More patients in GFCs (28.2%) experienced an MAE during the first year after surgery compared with UCCs (7.9%) with an OR of 4.56 (95% CI 2.23 to 9.34, p= 70 with operatively treated proximal femur fractures.InterventionsTreatment in UCCs (n=139) or GFCs (n=142), that is, interdisciplinary treatment including regular geriatric consultation and daily physiotherapy.Outcome measuresPrimary outcome was occurrence of prespecified MAEs, including delirium. Secondary outcomes included any other adverse events, time to surgery, time in acute ward, 1-year mortality, mobility, and quality of life.ResultsPatients treated in GFCs (n=142) had a mean age of 81.9 (SD, 6.6) years versus 83.9 (SD 6.9) years in patients (n=139) treated in UCCs (p=0.013) and a higher mean Charlson Comorbidity Index of 2.0 (SD, 2.1) versus 1.2 (SD, 1.5) in UCCs (p=0.001). More patients in GFCs (28.2%) experienced an MAE during the first year after surgery compared with UCCs (7.9%) with an OR of 4.56 (95% CI 2.23 to 9.34, p

Description

MeSH Terms

DeCS Terms

CIE Terms

Keywords

trauma management, hip, geriatric medicine, orthopaedic & trauma surgery, health services administration & management, Congestive-heart-failure, Length-of-stay, Hip fracture, Orthogeriatric care, Clinical pathway, Mortality, Quality, Intervention, Management, Diagnosis

Citation