Evaluation of criteria for clinical control in a prospective, international, multicenter study of patients with COPD.

No Thumbnail Available

Date

2018-01-31

Authors

Miravitlles, Marc
Sliwinski, Pawel
Rhee, Chin Kook
Costello, Richard W
Carter, Victoria
Tan, Jessica
Lapperre, Therese Sophie
Alcazar, Bernardino
Gouder, Caroline
Esquinas, Cristina

Advisors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Metrics
Google Scholar
Export

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

The concept of clinical control in COPD has been developed to help in treatment decisions, but it requires validation in prospective studies. This international, multicenter, prospective study aimed to validate the concept of control in COPD [control = stability (no exacerbations or impairment in CAT scores) + low impact (low level of symptoms)]. Data from the screening visit was used to: investigate the level of control, compare characteristics of patients according to the control status, and perform a sensitivity analysis of the levels of control using either clinical criteria or questionnaires (COPD Assessment Test -CAT- or Clinical COPD Questionnaire -CCQ-). A total of 314 patients were analysed, mean age was 68.5 years and mean FEV1 was 52.6% of predicted. According to the prespecified criteria 21% of patients were classified as controlled, all of them with mild/moderate COPD (Body mass index, Obstruction, Dyspnea and Exacerbations, -BODEx-index The proposed criteria of control were only fulfilled by 21% of patients. The suggested cut offs and their predictive value for poor outcomes need to be refined in prospective studies.

Description

MeSH Terms

Aged
Bronchodilator Agents
Early Diagnosis
Female
Forced Expiratory Volume
Humans
Male
Prognosis
Prospective Studies
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
Surveys and Questionnaires
Vital Capacity

DeCS Terms

CIE Terms

Keywords

CAT, CCQ, COPD, Control, Outcomes

Citation