The Efficacy of Therapeutic Respiratory Muscle Training Interventions in People with Bronchiectasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

dc.contributor.authorMartín-Valero, Rocio
dc.contributor.authorJimenez-Cebrian, Ana Maria
dc.contributor.authorMoral-Munoz, Jose A
dc.contributor.authorde-la-Casa-Almeida, Maria
dc.contributor.authorRodriguez-Huguet, Manuel
dc.contributor.authorCasuso-Holgado, Maria Jesus
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-07T17:23:23Z
dc.date.available2025-01-07T17:23:23Z
dc.date.issued2020-01-15
dc.description.abstractBackground: Respiratory muscle dysfunction is an important health problem with high morbidity and mortality and associated costs in patients with bronchiectasis (BC). The aim of this study was to analyse the effects of therapeutic respiratory muscle training (RMT) interventions on improving sputum clearance, ventilator function, muscle strength and functional capacity in BC. Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Two independent investigators searched using several electronic databases. The methodological quality of nine studies was assessed using the PEDro scale. Study selection/eligibility criteria: The following were included: randomised controlled trials, randomised crossover trials and pilot studies of patients with BC that used the intervention as RMT (inspiratory/expiratory) and evaluations of respiratory muscle strength (maximal expiratory pressure/maximal inspiratory pressure). This systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42017075101). Nine studies were included, five of which obtained an A recommendation grade, three with B, and one with C. Study quality was poor to good (mean PEDro Score of 6.375 out of 10). Studies had small sample sizes (8-98). Results show improvements on PImax in favour of therapeutic respiratory muscle training intervention (MD = 6.08; 95% CI = 1.38, 10.77; p < 0.01; I2 = 92%). However, high heterogeneity was identified on meta-analysis.
dc.description.version
dc.identifier.citationMartín-Valero R, Jimenez-Cebrian AM, Moral-Munoz JA, de-la-Casa-Almeida M, Rodriguez-Huguet M, Casuso-Holgado MJ. The Efficacy of Therapeutic Respiratory Muscle Training Interventions in People with Bronchiectasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med. 2020;9(1):231. Published 2020 Jan 15.
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/jcm9010231
dc.identifier.issn2077-0383
dc.identifier.pmcPMC7019679
dc.identifier.pmid31952338
dc.identifier.pubmedURLhttps://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7019679/pdf
dc.identifier.unpaywallURLhttps://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/9/1/231/pdf?version=1579679857
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10668/28352
dc.issue.number1
dc.journal.titleJournal of clinical medicine
dc.journal.titleabbreviationJ Clin Med
dc.language.isoen
dc.organizationInstituto de Investigación e Innovación Biomédica de Cádiz (INiBICA)
dc.organizationSAS - Hospital de La Línea de La Concepción
dc.page.number17
dc.provenanceRealizada la curación de contenido 14/05/2025
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.pubmedtypeJournal Article
dc.pubmedtypeReview
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.mdpi.com/618312
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectbronchiectasis
dc.subjectmaximum expiratory pressure
dc.subjectmaximum inspiratory pressure
dc.subjectmeta-analysis
dc.subjectrespiratory muscle strength
dc.subjectrespiratory muscle training
dc.subject.decsBronquiectasia
dc.subject.decsMúsculos Respiratorios
dc.subject.decsPresiones Respiratorias Máximas
dc.subject.decsEjercicios Respiratorios
dc.subject.decsEsputo
dc.subject.meshMaximal Respiratory Pressures
dc.subject.meshSputum
dc.subject.meshBreathing Exercises
dc.subject.meshRespiratory Muscles
dc.subject.meshBronchiectasis
dc.titleThe Efficacy of Therapeutic Respiratory Muscle Training Interventions in People with Bronchiectasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
dc.typereview
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.volume.number9

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
PMC7019679.pdf
Size:
1.76 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format