Publication: Author response to: Hardly traceable pitfalls in medical review articles.
Loading...
Identifiers
Date
2022-05-26
Authors
Valencia-Chulian, Rafael
Heredia-Rizo, Alberto Marcos
Moral-Munoz, Jose A
Lucena-Anton, David
Luque-Moreno, Carlos
Advisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Elsevier
Abstract
Conducting a systematic review. Should we based our scientific analysis on personal impressions? The present letter is in response to a letter to the editor entitled “Hardly traceable pitfalls in medical review articles”, recently published in Complementary Therapies in Medicine. In this letter,
co-authors Olaf R. van Loon and A.J. van Loon discussed some allegedly
pitfalls in our 2020 systematic review investigating the effects of dry
needling in people after stroke,2 review that the authors identified as the
RVC study.
Description
MeSH Terms
Publications
Reference Standards
Humans
Reference Standards
Humans
DeCS Terms
Estándares de referencia
Humanos
Publicaciones
Humanos
Publicaciones
CIE Terms
Keywords
Dry Needling, Complementary Therapies, Medicine
Citation
Valencia-Chulián R, Heredia-Rizo AM, Moral-Munoz JA, Lucena-Anton D, Luque-Moreno C. Author response to: Hardly traceable pitfalls in medical review articles. Complement Ther Med. 2022 Sep;68:102844