Publication:
Repeated procedures at the generator pocket are a determinant of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator infection.

dc.contributor.authorArana-Rueda, Eduardo
dc.contributor.authorPedrote, Alonso
dc.contributor.authorFrutos-López, Manuel
dc.contributor.authorAcosta, Juan
dc.contributor.authorJauregui, Beatriz
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Riesco, Lorena
dc.contributor.authorArce-León, Álvaro
dc.contributor.authorGómez-Pulido, Federico
dc.contributor.authorSánchez-Brotons, Juan A
dc.contributor.authorGutiérrez-Carretero, Encarnación
dc.contributor.authorde Alarcón-González, Arístides
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-25T09:47:49Z
dc.date.available2023-01-25T09:47:49Z
dc.date.issued2017-06-21
dc.description.abstractRates of cardiac-device infections have increased in recent years, but the current incidence and risk factors for infection in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are not well known. The increasing number of ICD infections is related to accumulated pocket manipulations over time. This single-center, prospective study included patients that underwent ICD implantation from 2008 to 2015. The endpoint was time to infection. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors related to infection. The study included a total of 570 patients, of whom 419 (73.5%) underwent a first implantation. Mean age was 59 ± 14 years, and 80% were male. During a median follow-up of 36 months (interquartile range, 18-61 months; 1887 patient-years), infection was identified in 26 patients (4.56%), an incidence of 14.9 × 1000 patient-years. Median time to infection was 9.7 months (interquartile range, 1.35-23.4 months), and 38.5% were late infections (beyond 12 months of follow-up). In patients with replacement implants, the incidence was 3-fold higher than in first implantations (27.7 vs 9.1 × 1000 patient-years; P = 0.002). Cox regression identified 2 independent predictors of ICD infection: cumulative number of interventions at the generator pocket (hazard ratio: 1.92, 95% confidence interval: 1.42-2.6, P The incidence of infection in ICD patients is greater than previously reported, largely due to late infections. Each new cumulative intervention at the same generator pocket nearly doubles the risk of infection.
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/clc.22743
dc.identifier.essn1932-8737
dc.identifier.pmcPMC6490359
dc.identifier.pmid28636098
dc.identifier.pubmedURLhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6490359/pdf
dc.identifier.unpaywallURLhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1002/clc.22743
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10668/11328
dc.issue.number10
dc.journal.titleClinical cardiology
dc.journal.titleabbreviationClin Cardiol
dc.language.isoen
dc.organizationHospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío
dc.organizationHospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío
dc.page.number892-898
dc.pubmedtypeJournal Article
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.subjectDefibrillation-ICD
dc.subjectIncidence
dc.subjectInfection Complication
dc.subjectNoninvasive Risk Assessment Tests
dc.subject.meshAdult
dc.subject.meshAged
dc.subject.meshDefibrillators, Implantable
dc.subject.meshElectric Countershock
dc.subject.meshFemale
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshIncidence
dc.subject.meshKaplan-Meier Estimate
dc.subject.meshMale
dc.subject.meshMiddle Aged
dc.subject.meshMultivariate Analysis
dc.subject.meshProportional Hazards Models
dc.subject.meshProspective Studies
dc.subject.meshProsthesis-Related Infections
dc.subject.meshRegistries
dc.subject.meshRisk Assessment
dc.subject.meshRisk Factors
dc.subject.meshSpain
dc.subject.meshTime Factors
dc.subject.meshTreatment Outcome
dc.titleRepeated procedures at the generator pocket are a determinant of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator infection.
dc.typeresearch article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.volume.number40
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files