Publication:
Humanized Mouse Models to Evaluate Cancer Immunotherapeutics

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2021-01-01

Authors

Guil-Luna, Silvia
Sedlik, Christine
Piaggio, Eliane
Jacks, T
Sawyers, CL

Advisors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Annual Reviews
Metrics
Google Scholar
Export

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

Immunotherapy is at the forefront of cancer treatment. The advent of numerous novel approaches to cancer immunotherapy, including immune checkpoint antibodies, adoptive transfer of CAR (chimeric antigen receptor) T cells and TCR (T cell receptor) T cells, NK (natural killer) cells, T cell engagers, oncolytic viruses, and vaccines, is revolutionizing the treatment for different tumor types. Some are already in the clinic, and many others are underway. However, not all patients respond, resistance develops, and as available therapies multiply there is a need to further understand how they work, how to prioritize their clinical evaluation, and how to combine them. For this, animal models have been highly instrumental, and humanized mice models (i.e., immunodeficient mice engrafted with human immune and cancer cells) represent a step forward, although they have several limitations. Here, we review the different humanized models available today, the approaches to overcome their flaws, their use for the evaluation of cancer immunotherapies, and their anticipated evolution as tools to help personalized clinical decision-making.

Description

MeSH Terms

T-cells
Immune-responses
Antitumor-activity
Class-i
Solid tumors
Gm-csf
Reconstitution
Generation
Induction

DeCS Terms

Factor estimulante de colonias de granulocitos y macrófagos
Linfocitos T
Neoplasias

CIE Terms

Keywords

Humanized mice, Immuno-oncology, Preclinical research, Immunotherapy, Cancer, Patient-derived xenograft, Lymphoid-system mice

Citation

Guil-Luna S, Sedlik C, Piaggio E. Humanized Mouse Models to Evaluate Cancer Immunotherapeutics. Annual Review Of Cancer Biology [Internet]. 4 de marzo de 2021;5(1):119-36