Publication:
TMA-93 for Diagnosing Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Comparison With the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test.

No Thumbnail Available

Date

2019-05-13

Authors

Rodrigo-Herrero, Silvia
Carnero-Pardo, Cristóbal
Méndez-Barrio, Carlota
De Miguel-Tristancho, Miguel
Graciani-Cantisán, Eugenia
Sánchez-Arjona, María Bernal
Maillet, Didier
Jiménez-Hernández, María Dolores
Franco-Macías, Emilio

Advisors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Metrics
Google Scholar
Export

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

TMA-93 examines binding by images, an advantage for the less educated individuals. To compare the discriminative validity of TMA-93 against the picture version of Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test (FCSRT) to distinguish patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) from normal controls (NCs) without excluding less educated individuals. Phase I diagnostic evaluation study. A total of 30 patients with aMCI and 30 NCs matched for sociodemographics variables. The diagnostic accuracy for each test was calculated by conducting receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Hanley and McNeil method was used to compare diagnostic accuracy of different tests on the same sample. Up to 41.7% of the sample had less than a first grade of education. Both tests showed excellent diagnostic accuracy. The comparisons did not show significant differences. TMA-93 is so accurate as FCSRT to differentiate aMCI from controls including less educated individuals. The test could be considered as a choice in this sociodemographic context.

Description

MeSH Terms

Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Amnesia
Case-Control Studies
Cognitive Dysfunction
Cross-Sectional Studies
Cues
Female
Humans
Male
Mental Recall
Neuropsychological Tests
Reproducibility of Results

DeCS Terms

CIE Terms

Keywords

FCSRT, ROC curves, TMA-93, amnestic MCI, binding, diagnostic accuracy

Citation