RT Journal Article
T1 TMA-93 for Diagnosing Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Comparison With the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test.
A1 Rodrigo-Herrero, Silvia
A1 Carnero-Pardo, Cristóbal
A1 Méndez-Barrio, Carlota
A1 De Miguel-Tristancho, Miguel
A1 Graciani-Cantisán, Eugenia
A1 Sánchez-Arjona, María Bernal
A1 Maillet, Didier
A1 Jiménez-Hernández, María Dolores
A1 Franco-Macías, Emilio
K1 FCSRT
K1 ROC curves
K1 TMA-93
K1 amnestic MCI
K1 binding
K1 diagnostic accuracy
AB TMA-93 examines binding by images, an advantage for the less educated individuals. To compare the discriminative validity of TMA-93 against the picture version of Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test (FCSRT) to distinguish patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) from normal controls (NCs) without excluding less educated individuals. Phase I diagnostic evaluation study. A total of 30 patients with aMCI and 30 NCs matched for sociodemographics variables. The diagnostic accuracy for each test was calculated by conducting receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Hanley and McNeil method was used to compare diagnostic accuracy of different tests on the same sample. Up to 41.7% of the sample had less than a first grade of education. Both tests showed excellent diagnostic accuracy. The comparisons did not show significant differences. TMA-93 is so accurate as FCSRT to differentiate aMCI from controls including less educated individuals. The test could be considered as a choice in this sociodemographic context.
YR 2019
FD 2019-05-13
LK http://hdl.handle.net/10668/13949
UL http://hdl.handle.net/10668/13949
LA en
DS RISalud
RD Apr 20, 2025