Publication:
Mobile health and supervised rehabilitation versus mobile health alone in breast cancer survivors: Randomized controlled trial.

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2019-07-29

Authors

Lozano-Lozano, Mario
Martin-Martin, Lydia
Galiano-Castillo, Noelia
Fernandez-Lao, Carolina
Cantarero-Villanueva, Irene
Lopez-Barajas, Isabel B
Arroyo-Morales, Manuel

Advisors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Elsevier Masson
Metrics
Google Scholar
Export

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

Survival rates in cancer are increasing exponentially, with a corresponding increase/influence in disability-adjusted life-years. Efforts should be made to explore the optimal balance between unsupervised/distance-based and supervised/onsite approaches to cancer care. This study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of the BENECA mobile Health (mHealth) lifestyle application combined with a supervised rehabilitation program (BENECA and supervised rehabilitation) versus the BENECA mHealth lifestyle application alone on quality of life (QoL) and functional outcomes of breast cancer survivors. This randomized controlled trial included 80 survivors of breast cancer diagnosed at stage I-IIIA, who completed adjuvant therapy and were overweight or obese at diagnosis. Participants were randomly allocated (ratio 1:1, 3 waves) to BENECA mHealth and rehabilitation for 2months (n=40) or BENECA mHealth and usual care (BENECA mHealth alone; n=40). Participants completed a questionnaire at baseline (T1), 8-weeks post-intervention (T2) and 6-month follow-up (T3). The primary outcome was QoL assessed with the EORT QLQ-C30. Secondary outcomes included upper-limb functionality and body composition. Statistical (between-group analyses of covariance) and clinical effects were analyzed by intention to treat. Both groups showed improved outcomes, but global QoL was significantly better with BENECA mHealth and rehabilitation than BENECA mHealth alone (mean difference, 12.76; 95% confidence interval 4.85; 20.67; P=0.004), with a moderate-to-large effect size (d=72). The proportion of participants reporting reliable clinical improvement on global QoL at T2 was higher with BENECA mHealth and rehabilitation than BENECA mHealth alone (57.5% vs 26.3%, P=0.008). Improvement in subjective and objective upper-limb functionality was also higher with BENECA mHealth and rehabilitation. The BENECA mHealth lifestyle application with a supervised rehabilitation program had a statistically and clinically significant effect on QoL and upper-limb functionality in breast cancer survivors and is a unique and important promising new approach.

Description

MeSH Terms

Adult
Aged
Arthrometry, Articular
Cancer Survivors
Combined Modality Therapy
Disability Evaluation
Female
Humans
Middle Aged
Occupational Therapy
Physical Functional Performance
Quality of Life
Single-Blind Method
Telerehabilitation
Treatment Outcome

DeCS Terms

Artrometría articular
Calidad de vida
Evaluación de la discapacidad
Método simple ciego
Persona de mediana edad
Rendimiento físico funcional
Supervivientes de cáncer
Resultado del tratamiento
Terapia combinada
Telerrehabilitación

CIE Terms

Keywords

Breast cancer, Integral strategy, Occupational therapy, Rehabilitation, mHealth

Citation

Lozano-Lozano M, Martín-Martín L, Galiano-Castillo N, Fernández-Lao C, Cantarero-Villanueva I, López-Barajas IB, et al. Mobile health and supervised rehabilitation versus mobile health alone in breast cancer survivors: Randomized controlled trial. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2020 Jul;63(4):316-324.