Publication:
In silico assessment of collateral eddy current heating in biocompatible implants subjected to magnetic hyperthermia treatments

dc.contributor.authorRubia-Rodríguez, Irene
dc.contributor.authorZilberti, Luca
dc.contributor.authorArduino, Alessandro
dc.contributor.authorBottauscio, Oriano
dc.contributor.authorChiampi, Mario
dc.contributor.authorOrtega, Daniel
dc.contributor.authoraffiliation[Rubia-Rodríguez,I; Ortega,D] IMDEA Nanoscience, Madrid, Spain. [Zilberti,L; Arduino,A; Bottauscio,O; Chiampi,M] Istituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica (INRIM), Turin, Italy. [Ortega,D] Institute of Research and Innovation in Biomedical Sciences of the Province of Cádiz (INiBICA), University of Cádiz, Cádiz, Spain. [Ortega,D] Condensed Matter Physics department, University of Cádiz, Cádiz, Spain.
dc.contributor.funderThis work has been supported by the NoCanTher project, which has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No [685795]. The authors acknowledge support from the COST Association through the COST actions ‘RADIOMAG’ [TD1402] and ‘MyWAVE’ [CA17115]. D.O. and I.R.R. acknowledge financial support from the Community of Madrid under Contract No. [PEJD-2017-PRE/IND-3663], from the Error! Hyperlink refer ence not valid. through the Ramon y Cajal grant [RYC2018-025253-I] and Research Networks [RED2018-102626-Hiroshima], as well as the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness through the grants [MAT2017-85617- R] and the ‘Severo Ochoa’ Program for Centers of Excellence in R&D [SEV-2016-0686]. We gratefully acknowledge the support of NVIDIA Corporation through the GPU Grant Program with the donation of the Quadro P6000 GPU used for this research. D. O. acknowledges support from the Programme for the Promotion and Encouragement of Research and Transfer activities at the University of Cadiz.
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-13T06:52:26Z
dc.date.available2022-07-13T06:52:26Z
dc.date.issued2021-06-01
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Bearing partially or fully metallic passive implants represents an exclusion criterion for patients undergoing a magnetic hyperthermia procedure, but there are no specific studies backing this restrictive decision. This work assesses how the secondary magnetic field generated at the surface of two common types of prostheses affects the safety and efficiency of magnetic hyperthermia treatments of localized tumors. The paper also proposes the combination of a multi-criteria decision analysis and a graphical representation of calculated data as an initial screening during the preclinical risk assessment for each patient.Materials and methods: Heating of a hip joint and a dental implant during the treatment of prostate, colorectal and head and neck tumors have been assessed considering different external field conditions and exposure times. The Maxwell equations including the secondary field produced by metallic prostheses have been solved numerically in a discretized computable human model. The heat exchange problem has been solved through a modified version of the Pennes' bioheat equation assuming a temperature dependency of blood perfusion and metabolic heat, i.e. thermorregulation. The degree of risk has been assessed using a risk index with parameters coming from custom graphs plotting the specific absorption rate (SAR) vs temperature increase, and coefficients derived from a multi-criteria decision analysis performed following the MACBETH approach.Results: The comparison of two common biomaterials for passive implants - Ti6Al4V and CoCrMo - shows that both specific absorption rate (SAR) and local temperature increase are found to be higher for the hip prosthesis made by Ti6Al4V despite its lower electrical and thermal conductivity. By tracking the time evolution of temperature upon field application, it has been established that there is a 30 s delay between the time point for which the thermal equilibrium is reached at prostheses and tissues. Likewise, damage may appear in those tissues adjacent to the prostheses at initial stages of treatment, since recommended thermal thresholds are soon surpassed for higher field intensities. However, it has also been found that under some operational conditions the typical safety rule of staying below or attain a maximum temperature increase or SAR value is met.Conclusion: The current exclusion criterion for implant-bearing patients in magnetic hyperthermia should be revised, since it may be too restrictive for a range of the typical field conditions used. Systematic in silico treatment planning using the proposed methodology after a well-focused diagnostic procedure can aid the clinical staff to find the appropriate limits for a safe treatment window.es_ES
dc.description.versionYeses_ES
dc.identifier.citationRubia-Rodríguez I, Zilberti L, Arduino A, Bottauscio O, Chiampi M, Ortega D. In silico assessment of collateral eddy current heating in biocompatible implants subjected to magnetic hyperthermia treatments. Int J Hyperthermia. 2021;38(1):846-861es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/02656736.2021.1909758es_ES
dc.identifier.essn1464-5157
dc.identifier.issn0265-6736
dc.identifier.pmid34074196es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10668/3784
dc.journal.titleInternational Journal of Hyperthermia
dc.language.isoen
dc.page.number17 p.
dc.publisherTaylor & Francises_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02656736.2021.1909758?scroll=top&needAccess=truees_ES
dc.rightsAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.accessRightsAcceso abiertoes_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectMagnetic hyperthermiaes_ES
dc.subjectEddy currentses_ES
dc.subjectMedical implantses_ES
dc.subjectElectromagnetic dosimetryes_ES
dc.subjectIn silicoes_ES
dc.subjectHipertermiaes_ES
dc.subjectFenómenos magnéticoses_ES
dc.subjectCampos magnéticoses_ES
dc.subjectImplantes dentaleses_ES
dc.subjectSimulación por computadores_ES
dc.subject.meshMedical Subject Headings::Information Science::Information Science::Computing Methodologies::Computer Simulationes_ES
dc.subject.meshMedical Subject Headings::Organisms::Eukaryota::Animals::Chordata::Vertebrates::Mammals::Primates::Haplorhini::Catarrhini::Hominidae::Humanses_ES
dc.subject.meshMedical Subject Headings::Phenomena and Processes::Physical Phenomena::Magnetic Phenomena::Magnetic Fieldses_ES
dc.subject.meshMedical Subject Headings::Disciplines and Occupations::Natural Science Disciplines::Physics::Magneticses_ES
dc.subject.meshMedical Subject Headings::Check Tags::Malees_ES
dc.subject.meshMedical Subject Headings::Health Care::Environment and Public Health::Environment::Environment, Controlled::Heatinges_ES
dc.subject.meshMedical Subject Headings::Analytical, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Techniques and Equipment::Therapeutics::Hyperthermia, Inducedes_ES
dc.subject.meshMedical Subject Headings::Diseases::Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms::Pathologic Processes::Intraoperative Complications::Malignant Hyperthermiaes_ES
dc.subject.meshMedical Subject Headings::Analytical, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Techniques and Equipment::Dentistry::Prosthodontics::Dental Prosthesis::Dental Implantses_ES
dc.subject.meshMedical Subject Headings::Analytical, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Techniques and Equipment::Equipment and Supplies::Prostheses and Implants::Joint Prosthesis::Hip Prosthesises_ES
dc.titleIn silico assessment of collateral eddy current heating in biocompatible implants subjected to magnetic hyperthermia treatmentses_ES
dc.typeresearch article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dspace.entity.typePublication
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
RubiaRodriguez_InSilicoAssessment.pdf
Size:
4.03 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Artículo original
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
RubiaRodriguez_InSilicoAssessment_MaterialSuplementario.pdf
Size:
3.78 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Material suplementario