Publication:
Recommendations for determining the validity of consumer wearable heart rate devices: expert statement and checklist of the INTERLIVE Network.

dc.contributor.authorMühlen, Jan M
dc.contributor.authorStang, Julie
dc.contributor.authorLykke Skovgaard, Esben
dc.contributor.authorJudice, Pedro B
dc.contributor.authorMolina-Garcia, Pablo
dc.contributor.authorJohnston, William
dc.contributor.authorSardinha, Luís B
dc.contributor.authorOrtega, Francisco B
dc.contributor.authorCaulfield, Brian
dc.contributor.authorBloch, Wilhelm
dc.contributor.authorCheng, Sulin
dc.contributor.authorEkelund, Ulf
dc.contributor.authorBrønd, Jan Christian
dc.contributor.authorGrøntved, Anders
dc.contributor.authorSchumann, Moritz
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-09T10:39:12Z
dc.date.available2023-02-09T10:39:12Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-04
dc.description.abstractAssessing vital signs such as heart rate (HR) by wearable devices in a lifestyle-related environment provides widespread opportunities for public health related research and applications. Commonly, consumer wearable devices assessing HR are based on photoplethysmography (PPG), where HR is determined by absorption and reflection of emitted light by the blood. However, methodological differences and shortcomings in the validation process hamper the comparability of the validity of various wearable devices assessing HR. Towards Intelligent Health and Well-Being: Network of Physical Activity Assessment (INTERLIVE) is a joint European initiative of six universities and one industrial partner. The consortium was founded in 2019 and strives towards developing best-practice recommendations for evaluating the validity of consumer wearables and smartphones. This expert statement presents a best-practice validation protocol for consumer wearables assessing HR by PPG. The recommendations were developed through the following multi-stage process: (1) a systematic literature review based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, (2) an unstructured review of the wider literature pertaining to factors that may introduce bias during the validation of these devices and (3) evidence-informed expert opinions of the INTERLIVE Network. A total of 44 articles were deemed eligible and retrieved through our systematic literature review. Based on these studies, a wider literature review and our evidence-informed expert opinions, we propose a validation framework with standardised recommendations using six domains: considerations for the target population, criterion measure, index measure, testing conditions, data processing and the statistical analysis. As such, this paper presents recommendations to standardise the validity testing and reporting of PPG-based HR wearables used by consumers. Moreover, checklists are provided to guide the validation protocol development and reporting. This will ensure that manufacturers, consumers, healthcare providers and researchers use wearables safely and to its full potential.
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bjsports-2020-103148
dc.identifier.essn1473-0480
dc.identifier.pmcPMC8273688
dc.identifier.pmid33397674
dc.identifier.pubmedURLhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8273688/pdf
dc.identifier.unpaywallURLhttps://bjsm.bmj.com/content/bjsports/55/14/767.full.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10668/16916
dc.issue.number14
dc.journal.titleBritish journal of sports medicine
dc.journal.titleabbreviationBr J Sports Med
dc.language.isoen
dc.organizationIBS
dc.page.number767-779
dc.pubmedtypeGuideline
dc.pubmedtypeJournal Article
dc.pubmedtypeSystematic Review
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subjectcardiology
dc.subjectconsensus statement
dc.subjectpublic health
dc.subjectsports and exercise medicine
dc.subjectsports medicine
dc.subject.meshAge Factors
dc.subject.meshArtifacts
dc.subject.meshBody Height
dc.subject.meshBody Mass Index
dc.subject.meshChecklist
dc.subject.meshConsensus
dc.subject.meshEurope
dc.subject.meshExercise
dc.subject.meshHeart Rate
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshLighting
dc.subject.meshPhotoplethysmography
dc.subject.meshPressure
dc.subject.meshReference Standards
dc.subject.meshReproducibility of Results
dc.subject.meshSex Factors
dc.subject.meshSkin Pigmentation
dc.subject.meshUniversities
dc.subject.meshWearable Electronic Devices
dc.titleRecommendations for determining the validity of consumer wearable heart rate devices: expert statement and checklist of the INTERLIVE Network.
dc.typeresearch article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.volume.number55
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
PMC8273688.pdf
Size:
968.81 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format