Publication:
Recommendations for determining the validity of consumer wearable heart rate devices: expert statement and checklist of the INTERLIVE Network.

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2021-01-04

Authors

Mühlen, Jan M
Stang, Julie
Lykke Skovgaard, Esben
Judice, Pedro B
Molina-Garcia, Pablo
Johnston, William
Sardinha, Luís B
Ortega, Francisco B
Caulfield, Brian
Bloch, Wilhelm

Advisors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Metrics
Google Scholar
Export

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

Assessing vital signs such as heart rate (HR) by wearable devices in a lifestyle-related environment provides widespread opportunities for public health related research and applications. Commonly, consumer wearable devices assessing HR are based on photoplethysmography (PPG), where HR is determined by absorption and reflection of emitted light by the blood. However, methodological differences and shortcomings in the validation process hamper the comparability of the validity of various wearable devices assessing HR. Towards Intelligent Health and Well-Being: Network of Physical Activity Assessment (INTERLIVE) is a joint European initiative of six universities and one industrial partner. The consortium was founded in 2019 and strives towards developing best-practice recommendations for evaluating the validity of consumer wearables and smartphones. This expert statement presents a best-practice validation protocol for consumer wearables assessing HR by PPG. The recommendations were developed through the following multi-stage process: (1) a systematic literature review based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, (2) an unstructured review of the wider literature pertaining to factors that may introduce bias during the validation of these devices and (3) evidence-informed expert opinions of the INTERLIVE Network. A total of 44 articles were deemed eligible and retrieved through our systematic literature review. Based on these studies, a wider literature review and our evidence-informed expert opinions, we propose a validation framework with standardised recommendations using six domains: considerations for the target population, criterion measure, index measure, testing conditions, data processing and the statistical analysis. As such, this paper presents recommendations to standardise the validity testing and reporting of PPG-based HR wearables used by consumers. Moreover, checklists are provided to guide the validation protocol development and reporting. This will ensure that manufacturers, consumers, healthcare providers and researchers use wearables safely and to its full potential.

Description

MeSH Terms

Age Factors
Artifacts
Body Height
Body Mass Index
Checklist
Consensus
Europe
Exercise
Heart Rate
Humans
Lighting
Photoplethysmography
Pressure
Reference Standards
Reproducibility of Results
Sex Factors
Skin Pigmentation
Universities
Wearable Electronic Devices

DeCS Terms

CIE Terms

Keywords

cardiology, consensus statement, public health, sports and exercise medicine, sports medicine

Citation