Publication: Pros and Cons of Clinical Basophil Testing (BAT).
Loading...
Identifiers
Date
2016-07-13
Authors
Hoffmann, Hans Jürgen
Knol, Edward F
Ferrer, Martha
Mayorga, Lina
Sabato, Vito
Santos, Alexandra F
Eberlein, Bernadette
Nopp, Anna
MacGlashan, Donald
Advisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Springer
Abstract
We review basophil testing by flow cytometry with an emphasis on advantages and disadvantages. There are many tools available to assess the presence and severity of allergic diseases in patients. For 50 years, peripheral blood basophils have been used as tools to study these diseases. It is a very accessible cell that binds IgE antibody and secretes the classical mediators responsible for the symptoms of allergic reactions. In the last decade, an even more accessible methodology, using flow cytometry, has been developed to enhance the ability to use basophils for both mechanistic and clinical diagnostics. Basophil testing has been included in diagnostics for different forms of allergies as well as to monitor disease status. A variety of studies have begun to establish both precise methods and their clinical relevance for disease diagnosis, but there remain some important questions on how to take optimal advantage of the behaviours of basophils.
Description
MeSH Terms
Basophils
Flow Cytometry
Humans
Hypersensitivity
Humans
Basophils
Flow cytometry
Clinical relevance
Hypersensitivity
Immunoglobulin E
Flow Cytometry
Humans
Hypersensitivity
Humans
Basophils
Flow cytometry
Clinical relevance
Hypersensitivity
Immunoglobulin E
DeCS Terms
Basófilos
Citometría de flujo
Hipersensibilidad
Humanos
Inmunoglobulina E
Relevancia clínica
Citometría de flujo
Hipersensibilidad
Humanos
Inmunoglobulina E
Relevancia clínica
CIE Terms
Keywords
Allergy, BAT, Basophil granulocyte, CD63, Chronic urticaria, Mast cell
Citation
Hoffmann HJ, Knol EF, Ferrer M, Mayorga L, Sabato V, Santos AF, et al. Pros and Cons of Clinical Basophil Testing (BAT). Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2016 Jul;16(8):56