Publication:
Pros and Cons of Clinical Basophil Testing (BAT).

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2016-07-13

Authors

Hoffmann, Hans Jürgen
Knol, Edward F
Ferrer, Martha
Mayorga, Lina
Sabato, Vito
Santos, Alexandra F
Eberlein, Bernadette
Nopp, Anna
MacGlashan, Donald

Advisors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Springer
Metrics
Google Scholar
Export

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

We review basophil testing by flow cytometry with an emphasis on advantages and disadvantages. There are many tools available to assess the presence and severity of allergic diseases in patients. For 50 years, peripheral blood basophils have been used as tools to study these diseases. It is a very accessible cell that binds IgE antibody and secretes the classical mediators responsible for the symptoms of allergic reactions. In the last decade, an even more accessible methodology, using flow cytometry, has been developed to enhance the ability to use basophils for both mechanistic and clinical diagnostics. Basophil testing has been included in diagnostics for different forms of allergies as well as to monitor disease status. A variety of studies have begun to establish both precise methods and their clinical relevance for disease diagnosis, but there remain some important questions on how to take optimal advantage of the behaviours of basophils.

Description

MeSH Terms

Basophils
Flow Cytometry
Humans
Hypersensitivity
Humans
Basophils
Flow cytometry
Clinical relevance
Hypersensitivity
Immunoglobulin E

DeCS Terms

Basófilos
Citometría de flujo
Hipersensibilidad
Humanos
Inmunoglobulina E
Relevancia clínica

CIE Terms

Keywords

Allergy, BAT, Basophil granulocyte, CD63, Chronic urticaria, Mast cell

Citation

Hoffmann HJ, Knol EF, Ferrer M, Mayorga L, Sabato V, Santos AF, et al. Pros and Cons of Clinical Basophil Testing (BAT). Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2016 Jul;16(8):56