Publication:
Updated Efficacy Analysis Including Secondary Population Results for OAK: A Randomized Phase III Study of Atezolizumab versus Docetaxel in Patients with Previously Treated Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

dc.contributor.authorFehrenbacher, Louis
dc.contributor.authorvon-Pawel, Joachim
dc.contributor.authorPark, Keunchil
dc.contributor.authorRittmeyer, Achim
dc.contributor.authorGandara, David R
dc.contributor.authorPonce-Aix, Santiago
dc.contributor.authorHan, Ji-Youn
dc.contributor.authorGadgeel, Shirish M
dc.contributor.authorHida, Toyoaki
dc.contributor.authorCortinovis, Diego L
dc.contributor.authorCobo, Manuel
dc.contributor.authorKowalski, Dariusz M
dc.contributor.authorDe-Marinis, Filippo
dc.contributor.authorGandhi, Mayank
dc.contributor.authorDanner, Bradford
dc.contributor.authorMatheny, Christina
dc.contributor.authorKowanetz, Marcin
dc.contributor.authorHe, Pei
dc.contributor.authorFelizzi, Federico
dc.contributor.authorPatel, Hina
dc.contributor.authorSandler, Alan
dc.contributor.authorBallinger, Marcus
dc.contributor.authorBarlesi, Fabrice
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-25T10:09:21Z
dc.date.available2023-01-25T10:09:21Z
dc.date.issued2018-05-17
dc.description.abstractThe efficacy and safety of atezolizumab versus the efficacy and safety of docetaxel as second- or third-line treatment in patients with advanced NSCLC in the primary (n = 850) and secondary (n = 1225) efficacy populations of the randomized phase III OAK study (respectively referred to as the intention-to-treat [ITT] 850 [ITT850] and ITT1225) at an updated data cutoff were assessed. Patients received atezolizumab, 1200 mg, or docetaxel, 75 mg/m2, intravenously every 3 weeks until loss of clinical benefit or disease progression, respectively. The primary end point was overall survival (OS) in the ITT population and programmed death-ligand 1-expressing subgroup. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to evaluate the impact of subsequent immunotherapy use in the docetaxel arm on the observed survival benefit with atezolizumab. Atezolizumab demonstrated an OS benefit versus docetaxel in the updated ITT850 (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.75, 95% confidence interval: 0.64-0.89, p = 0.0006) and the ITT1225 (HR = 0.80, 95% confidence interval: 0.70-0.92, p = 0.0012) after minimum follow-up times of 26 and 21 months, respectively. Improved survival with atezolizumab was observed across programmed death-ligand 1 and histological subgroups. In the immunotherapy sensitivity analysis, the relative OS benefit with atezolizumab was slightly greater in the ITT850 (HR = 0.69) and ITT1225 (HR = 0.74) than the conventional OS estimate. Fewer patients receiving atezolizumab experienced grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events (14.9%) than did patients receiving docetaxel (42.4%); no grade 5 adverse events related to atezolizumab were observed. The results of the updated ITT850 and initial ITT1225 analyses were consistent with those of the primary efficacy analysis demonstrating survival benefit with atezolizumab versus with docetaxel. Atezolizumab continued to demonstrate a favorable safety profile after longer treatment exposure and follow-up.
dc.description.versionSi
dc.identifier.citationFehrenbacher L, von Pawel J, Park K, Rittmeyer A, Gandara DR, Ponce Aix S, et al. Updated Efficacy Analysis Including Secondary Population Results for OAK: A Randomized Phase III Study of Atezolizumab versus Docetaxel in Patients with Previously Treated Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2018 Aug;13(8):1156-1170. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2018.04.039. Epub 2018 May 17. Erratum in: J Thorac Oncol. 2018 Nov;13(11):1800
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jtho.2018.04.039
dc.identifier.essn1556-1380
dc.identifier.pmid29777823
dc.identifier.unpaywallURLhttp://www.jto.org/article/S1556086418306117/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10668/12488
dc.issue.number8
dc.journal.titleJournal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer
dc.journal.titleabbreviationJ Thorac Oncol
dc.language.isoen
dc.organizationHospital Universitario Regional de Málaga
dc.page.number1156-1170
dc.provenanceRealizada la curación de contenido 17/02/2025
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.pubmedtypeClinical Trial, Phase III
dc.pubmedtypeJournal Article
dc.pubmedtypeRandomized Controlled Trial
dc.pubmedtypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1556-0864(18)30611-7
dc.rights.accessRightsRestricted Access
dc.subjectAtezolizumab
dc.subjectCancer immunotherapy
dc.subjectCheckpoint inhibitor
dc.subjectNon–small cell lung cancer
dc.subjectPD-L1
dc.subject.decsAnticuerpos monoclonales
dc.subject.decsAntineoplásicos
dc.subject.decsCarcinoma de pulmón de células no pequeñas
dc.subject.decsInmunoterapia
dc.subject.decsNeoplasias pulmonares
dc.subject.meshAged
dc.subject.meshAntibodies, Monoclonal
dc.subject.meshAntibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
dc.subject.meshAntineoplastic Agents
dc.subject.meshCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
dc.subject.meshDocetaxel
dc.subject.meshFemale
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshImmunotherapy
dc.subject.meshLung Neoplasms
dc.subject.meshMale
dc.subject.meshSurvival Analysis
dc.subject.meshTreatment Outcome
dc.titleUpdated Efficacy Analysis Including Secondary Population Results for OAK: A Randomized Phase III Study of Atezolizumab versus Docetaxel in Patients with Previously Treated Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
dc.typeresearch article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.volume.number13
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
RISalud_Accesorestringido.pdf
Size:
93.39 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format