Publication:
Updated Efficacy Analysis Including Secondary Population Results for OAK: A Randomized Phase III Study of Atezolizumab versus Docetaxel in Patients with Previously Treated Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

No Thumbnail Available

Date

2018-05-17

Authors

Fehrenbacher, Louis
von-Pawel, Joachim
Park, Keunchil
Rittmeyer, Achim
Gandara, David R
Ponce-Aix, Santiago
Han, Ji-Youn
Gadgeel, Shirish M
Hida, Toyoaki
Cortinovis, Diego L

Advisors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Elsevier
Metrics
Google Scholar
Export

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

The efficacy and safety of atezolizumab versus the efficacy and safety of docetaxel as second- or third-line treatment in patients with advanced NSCLC in the primary (n = 850) and secondary (n = 1225) efficacy populations of the randomized phase III OAK study (respectively referred to as the intention-to-treat [ITT] 850 [ITT850] and ITT1225) at an updated data cutoff were assessed. Patients received atezolizumab, 1200 mg, or docetaxel, 75 mg/m2, intravenously every 3 weeks until loss of clinical benefit or disease progression, respectively. The primary end point was overall survival (OS) in the ITT population and programmed death-ligand 1-expressing subgroup. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to evaluate the impact of subsequent immunotherapy use in the docetaxel arm on the observed survival benefit with atezolizumab. Atezolizumab demonstrated an OS benefit versus docetaxel in the updated ITT850 (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.75, 95% confidence interval: 0.64-0.89, p = 0.0006) and the ITT1225 (HR = 0.80, 95% confidence interval: 0.70-0.92, p = 0.0012) after minimum follow-up times of 26 and 21 months, respectively. Improved survival with atezolizumab was observed across programmed death-ligand 1 and histological subgroups. In the immunotherapy sensitivity analysis, the relative OS benefit with atezolizumab was slightly greater in the ITT850 (HR = 0.69) and ITT1225 (HR = 0.74) than the conventional OS estimate. Fewer patients receiving atezolizumab experienced grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events (14.9%) than did patients receiving docetaxel (42.4%); no grade 5 adverse events related to atezolizumab were observed. The results of the updated ITT850 and initial ITT1225 analyses were consistent with those of the primary efficacy analysis demonstrating survival benefit with atezolizumab versus with docetaxel. Atezolizumab continued to demonstrate a favorable safety profile after longer treatment exposure and follow-up.

Description

MeSH Terms

Aged
Antibodies, Monoclonal
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
Antineoplastic Agents
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
Docetaxel
Female
Humans
Immunotherapy
Lung Neoplasms
Male
Survival Analysis
Treatment Outcome

DeCS Terms

Anticuerpos monoclonales
Antineoplásicos
Carcinoma de pulmón de células no pequeñas
Inmunoterapia
Neoplasias pulmonares

CIE Terms

Keywords

Atezolizumab, Cancer immunotherapy, Checkpoint inhibitor, Non–small cell lung cancer, PD-L1

Citation

Fehrenbacher L, von Pawel J, Park K, Rittmeyer A, Gandara DR, Ponce Aix S, et al. Updated Efficacy Analysis Including Secondary Population Results for OAK: A Randomized Phase III Study of Atezolizumab versus Docetaxel in Patients with Previously Treated Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2018 Aug;13(8):1156-1170. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2018.04.039. Epub 2018 May 17. Erratum in: J Thorac Oncol. 2018 Nov;13(11):1800