Deer, Timothy RFalowski, Steven MMoore, Gregory AHutcheson, J KelbyPeña, IsaacCandido, KennethCornidez, Eric GFraunberg, von Und ZuBlomme, BramCapobianco, Robyn A2023-05-032023-05-032022http://hdl.handle.net/10668/19844Prospective, international, multicenter, single-arm, post-market study. The aim of this study was to assess long-term safety and effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation using a passive recharge burst stimulation design for chronic intractable pain in the trunk and/or limbs. Herein we present 24-month outcomes from the TRIUMPH study (NCT03082261). Passive recharge burst spinal cord stimulation (B-SCS) uniquely mimics neuronal burst firing patterns in the nervous system and has been shown to modulate the affective and attentional components of pain processing. After a successful trial period, subjects received a permanent SCS implant and returned for follow-up at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Significant improvements in physical, mental, and emotional functioning observed after 6 months of treatment were maintained at 2 years. Pain catastrophizing scale (PCS) scores dropped below the population norm. Health-related quality of life on EQ-5D improved across all domains and the mean index score was within one standard deviation of norm. Pain reduction (on NRS) was statistically significant (P  Early positive results with B-SCS were maintained long term. Evidence across multiple assessment tools show that B-SCS can alleviate pain intensity, psychological distress, and improve physical function and health-related quality of life.Level of Evidence: 3.enAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Chronic PainHumansProspective StudiesQuality of LifeSpinal CordSpinal Cord StimulationTreatment Outcomeresearch article34812195open access10.1097/BRS.00000000000042831528-1159PMC8912964https://journals.lww.com/spinejournal/Fulltext/2022/04010/Passive_Recharge_Burst_Spinal_Cord_Stimulation.7.aspxhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8912964/pdf