Sánchez-Espín, GemmaRodríguez-Capitán, JorgeOtero Forero, Juan JoséBecerra Muñoz, Víctor ManuelRodríguez Caulo, Emiliano AndrésSuch-Martínez, MiguelPorras-Martín, CarlosVillaescusa-Catalán, José ManuelMataró-López, María JoséGuzón-Rementería, ArantaMelero-Tejedor, José MaríaGutiérrez-Carretero, EncarnaciónJiménez Navarro, Manuel Francisco2023-02-092023-02-092020-10-15http://hdl.handle.net/10668/16663Isolated tricuspid valve surgery is a rarely performed procedure and traditionally is associated with a bad prognosis, although its clinical outcomes still are little known. The aim of this study was to assess the short- and long-term clinical outcomes obtained at our center after isolated tricuspid valve surgery as treatment for severe tricuspid regurgitation. This retrospective study included 71 consecutive patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation who underwent isolated tricuspid valve surgery between December 1996 and December 2017. Perioperative and long-term mortality, tricuspid valve reoperation, and functional class were analyzed after follow up. Regarding surgery, 7% of patients received a De Vega annuloplasty, 14.1% an annuloplasty ring, 11.3% a mechanical prosthesis, and 67.6% a biological prosthesis. Perioperative mortality was 12.7% and no variable was shown to be predictive of this event. After a median follow up of 45.5 months, long-term mortality was 36.6%, and the multivariate analysis identified atrial fibrillation as the only predictor (Hazard Ratio 3.014, 95% confidence interval 1.06-8.566; P = 0.038). At the end of follow up, 63.6% of survivors had functional class I. Isolated tricuspid valve surgery was infrequent in our center. Perioperative mortality was high, as was long-term mortality. However, a high percentage of survivors were barely symptomatic after follow up.enAgedCardiac Valve AnnuloplastyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHeart Valve ProsthesisHumansMaleMiddle AgedReoperationRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSpainSurvival RateTreatment OutcomeTricuspid ValveTricuspid Valve Insufficiencyresearch article33234222open access10.1532/hsf.30931522-6662https://journal.hsforum.com/index.php/HSF/article/download/3093/5933