Gonzalez-Saenz de Tejada, MBilbao, AAnsola, LQuirós, RGarcía-Perez, LNavarro, GEscobar, A2023-01-252023-01-252019-02-14http://hdl.handle.net/10668/13567The Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) is one of the most widely used health-related quality of life questionnaires for patients with heart failure (HF). The objective of the present study was to explore the responsiveness of the MLHFQ by estimating the minimal detectable change (MDC) and the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in Spain. Patients hospitalized for HF in the participating hospitals completed the MLHFQ at baseline and 6 months, plus anchor questions at 6 months. To study responsiveness, patients were classified as having "improved", remained "the same" or "worsened", using anchor questions. We used the standardized effect size (SES), and standardized response mean (SRM) to measure the magnitude of the changes scores and calculate the MDC and MCID. Overall, 1211 patients completed the baseline and follow-up questionnaires 6 months after discharge. The mean changes in all MLHFQ domains followed a trend (P  All of these results suggest that all domains of the MLHFQ have a good sensitivity to change in the population studied.enAttribution 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Health-related quality of lifeHeart failureMinimal clinically important differenceMinnesota living with heart failure questionnairePsychometric propertiesResponsivenessAdultAgedFemaleHeart FailureHumansMaleMiddle AgedMinimal Clinically Important DifferenceMinnesotaQuality of LifeSpainSurveys and Questionnairesresearch article30764842open access10.1186/s12955-019-1104-21477-7525PMC6376687https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-019-1104-2https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6376687/pdf