Perez Fontan, MiguelRemon Rodriguez, Cesarda Cunha Naveira, MartaBorras Sans, MerceRodriguez Suarez, CarmenQuiros Ganga, PedroSanchez Alvarez, EmilioRodriguez-Carmona, Ana2023-02-122023-02-122016-07-081932-6203http://hdl.handle.net/10668/19150BackgroundBaseline residual kidney function (RKF) and its rate of decline during follow-up are purported to be reliable outcome predictors of patients undergoing Peritoneal Dialysis (PD). The independent contribution of each of these factors has not been elucidated.MethodWe report a multicenter, longitudinal study of 493 patients incident on PD and satisfying two conditions: a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) >= 1 mL/minute and a daily diuresis >= 300 mL. The main variables were the GFR (mean of urea and creatinine clearances) at PD inception and the GFR rate of decline during follow-up. The main outcome variable was patient mortality. The secondary outcome variables were: PD technique failure and risk of peritoneal infection. The statistical analysis was based on a multivariate approach, placing an emphasis on the interactions between the two main study variables.Main ResultsBaseline GFR and its rate of decline performed well as independent predictors of both patient mortality and risk of peritoneal infection. These two main study variables maintained a moderate correlation with each other (r(2) = 0.12, p= 1 mL/minute and a daily diuresis >= 300 mL. The main variables were the GFR (mean of urea and creatinine clearances) at PD inception and the GFR rate of decline during follow-up. The main outcome variable was patient mortality. The secondary outcome variables were: PD technique failure and risk of peritoneal infection. The statistical analysis was based on a multivariate approach, placing an emphasis on the interactions between the two main study variables.Main ResultsBaseline GFR and its rate of decline performed well as independent predictors of both patient mortality and risk of peritoneal infection. These two main study variables maintained a moderate correlation with each other (r(2) = 0.12, p= 300 mL. The main variables were the GFR (mean of urea and creatinine clearances) at PD inception and the GFR rate of decline during follow-up. The main outcome variable was patient mortality. The secondary outcome variables were: PD technique failure and risk of peritoneal infection. The statistical analysis was based on a multivariate approach, placing an emphasis on the interactions between the two main study variables.Main ResultsBaseline GFR and its rate of decline performed well as independent predictors of both patient mortality and risk of peritoneal infection. These two main study variables maintained a moderate correlation with each other (r(2) = 0.12, penAttribution 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Renal-functionRisk-factorsAdequacyClearanceSurvivalTrialDeathresearch articleopen access10.1371/journal.pone.0158696https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0158696&type=printable380005400106