García Hernández, Jesús ManuelLópez-Vidriero Tejedor, EmilioCastañeda González, SofíaYrayzoz Fuentes, JoaquínPeriáñez Moreno, RafaelSaval Benítez, Jose MaríaCarrascal Aldana, Guillermo2023-05-032023-05-032022-11-032197-1153http://hdl.handle.net/10668/20376The use of the posterior approach for harvesting hamstring grafts has recently become popular thanks to new all-inside techniques and retrograde drills. This study aims to compare the classic anterior approach with the posterior approach in the popliteal fossa. Retrospective comparative study of 100 consecutive cases of primary ligamentoplasty performed using ipsilateral semitendinosus autograft with at least one year of follow-up. 50 patients with anterior approach (group A) and 50 patients with posterior approach (P). Ratio men/women: 9/1. Mean age: 32 ± 13 years. Mean operative time: 64.88 ± 12.28 min. Graft harvest time; intraoperative complications (semitendinous [ST] tendon cut); postoperative neurological complications (allodynia, paresthesia, pain) or hematoma in the donor area; atrophy of the operated thigh compared to the contralateral thigh, postoperative VAS score, aesthetic satisfaction and overall satisfaction. Graft harvest time of 9.5 min in group A versus 5.25 min in group P (p  The posterior approach to harvesting the ipsilateral hamstring graft obtained better results than the anterior approach in terms of aesthetic satisfaction of the patient, lower rate of neurological complications (allodynia, paresthesias and hypoesthesia in the anterior region of the knee and leg) and shorter hamstring harvest time. IV.enAttribution 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ACL reconstructionPopliteal fossaPosterior harvestingSaphenous nerve injurySemitendinosus tendonresearch article36326935open access10.1186/s40634-022-00547-yPMC9633883https://jeo-esska.springeropen.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s40634-022-00547-yhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9633883/pdf