Serrano-Guerrero, EstrellaFrancisco Rodriguez-Testal, JuanMartin-Rodriguez, AgustinRuiz-Veguilla, Miguel2023-02-122023-02-122018-01-01http://hdl.handle.net/10668/19105The aim was to determine whether there are differences between groups in jumping to conclusions and the number of beads required to make a decision based on task difficulty. An assessment was made of 19 patients with non-affective psychosis, 19 with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), and 19 healthy controls. The Beads Task scale was used in its two versions. Patients with non-affective psychosis jumped to conclusions. There was significant interaction between group and task difficulty. Increased difficulty of the task did not affect the number of beads patients with non-affective psychosis or OCD needed to make their decision. However, healthy controls needed to see more beads before they could make a decision in the hard test than in the easy one. Patients with non-affective psychosis jump to conclusions, but neither this group nor the OCD patients benefit from the changes in task difficulty when making their decisions.enAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Decision-makingjumping to conclusionsnon-affective psychosisobsessive-compulsive disordertask difficultyCommunity assessmentBeads taskConclusionsValidationDelusionsModelBiasSchizophreniaMetaanalysisIndividualsresearch articleopen access10.1177/20438087187874202043-8087https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/2043808718787420446859400004