RT Journal Article
T1 Usefulness of the Hybrid RFR-FFR Approach: Results of a Prospective and Multicenter Analysis of Diagnostic Agreement between RFR and FFR-The RECOPA (REsting Full-Cycle Ratio Comparation versus Fractional Flow Reserve (A Prospective Validation)) Study
A1 Casanova-Sandoval, Juan
A1 Fernandez-Rodriguez, Diego
A1 Otaegui, Imanol
A1 Gil Jimenez, Teresa
A1 Rodriguez-Esteban, Marcos
A1 Rivera, Kristian
A1 Torres-Saura, Francisco
A1 Jimenez Diaz, Victor
A1 Ocaranza-Sanchez, Raymundo
A1 Peral Disdier, Vicente
A1 Sanchez-Elvira, Guillermo
A1 Worner, Fernando
K1 Wave-free ratio
K1 Invasive physiological indexes
K1 Artery stenosis severity
K1 Pressure measurements
K1 Blood-flow
K1 Coronary
AB Background. The resting full-cycle ratio (RFR) is a novel resting index which in contrast to the gold standard (fractional flow reserve (FFR)) does not require maximum hyperemia induction. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the agreement between RFR and FFR with the currently recommended thresholds and to design a hybrid RFR-FFR ischemia detection strategy, allowing a reduction of coronary vasodilator use. Materials and Methods. Patients subjected to invasive physiological study in 9 Spanish centers were prospectively recruited between April 2019 and March 2020. Sensitivity and specificity studies were made to assess diagnostic accuracy between the recommended levels of RFR
PB Wiley-hindawi
SN 0896-4327
YR 2021
FD 2021-03-31
LK http://hdl.handle.net/10668/19078
UL http://hdl.handle.net/10668/19078
LA en
DS RISalud
RD Apr 9, 2025