%0 Journal Article
%A Pascual, Isaac
%A Carrasco-Chinchilla, Fernando
%A Benito-Gonzalez, Tomas
%A Li, Chi Hion
%A Avanzas, Pablo
%A Nombela-Franco, Luis
%A Pan, Manuel
%A Serrador Frutos, Ana
%A Freixa, Xavier
%A Trillo-Nouche, Ramiro
%A Hernández-Antolín, Rosa A
%A Andraka Ikazuriaga, Leire
%A Cruz-Gonzalez, Ignacio
%A López-Mínguez, Jose R
%A Diez, Jose L
%A Berenguer-Jofresa, Alberto
%A Sanchis, Juan
%A Ruiz-Quevedo, Valeriano
%A Urbano-Carrillo, Cristobal
%A Dominguez, Juan F Oteo
%A Ortas-Nadal, Maria R
%A Molina Navarro, Eduardo
%A Carrillo, Xavier
%A Alonso-Briales, Juan H
%A Fernández-Vázquez, Felipe
%A Asmarats Serra, Luis
%A Hernandez-Vaquero, Daniel
%A Jimenez-Quevedo, Pilar
%A Mesa, Dolores
%A Rodríguez-Gabella, Tania
%A Regueiro, Ander
%A Martinez Monzonís, Amparo
%A Salido Tahoces, Luisa
%A Ruiz Gomez, Lara
%A Trejo-Velasco, Blanca
%A Becerra-Muñoz, Victor M
%A Garrote-Coloma, Carmen
%A Fernández Peregrina, Estafanía
%A Lorca, Rebeca
%A Agustín, Jose A De
%A Romero, Miguel
%A Amat-Santos, Ignacio J
%A Sabaté, Manel
%A Alvarez, Ana B Cid
%A Hernandez-Garcia, Jose M
%A Gualis, Javier
%A Arzamendi, Dabit
%A Moris, Cesar
%A Tirado-Conte, Gabriela
%A Sánchez-Recalde, Angel
%A Estevez-Loureiro, Rodrigo
%T Transcatheter Mitral Repair for Functional Mitral Regurgitation According to Left Ventricular Function: A Real-Life Propensity-Score Matched Study.
%D 2020
%@ 2077-0383
%U https://hdl.handle.net/10668/25845
%X Transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVR) could improve survival in functional mitral regurgitation (FMR), but it is necessary to consider the influence of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Therefore, we compare the outcomes after TMVR with Mitraclip® between two groups according to LVEF. In an observational registry study, we compared the outcomes in patients with FMR who underwent TMVR with and without LVEF  Among 535 FMR eligible patients, 144 patients with LVEF 30% (group 2) had similar propensity scores and were included in the analyses. The primary study endpoint was significantlly higher in group 1 (33.3% vs. 9.4%, p = 0.002). There was a maintained improvement in secondary endpoints without significant differences among groups. FMR patients with LVEF
%K Mitraclip
%K functional mitral regurgitation
%K left ventricular ejection Fraction
%K transcatheter
%~