RT Journal Article
T1 Role of capsule endoscopy in suspected celiac disease: A European multi-centre study
A1 Luján-Sanchis, M
A1 Pérez-Cuadrado-Robles, E
A1 García-Lledó, J
A1 Juanmartiñena Fernández, JF
A1 Elli, L
A1 Jiménez-García, VA
A1 Egea-Valenzuela, J
A1 Valle-Muñoz, J
A1 Carretero-Ribón, C
A1 Fernández-Urién-Sainz, I
A1 López-Higueras, A
A1 Alonso-Lázaro, N
A1 Sanjuan-Acosta, M
A1 Sánchez-Ceballos, F
A1 Rosa, B
A1 González-Vázquez, S
A1 Branchi, F
A1 Ruano-Díaz, I
A1 Prieto-De-Frías, C
A1 Pons-Beltrán, V
A1 Borque-Barrera, P
A1 González-Suárez, B
A1 Xavier, S
A1 Argüelles-Arias, F
A1 Herrerías-Gutiérrez, JM
A1 Pérez-Cuadrado-Martínez, E
A1 Sempere-García-Argüelles, J
K1 Anti-transglutaminase antibodies
K1 Capsule endoscopy
K1 Celiac disease
K1 Gluten-free diet
K1 Non-celiac gluten sensitivity
K1 Atrofia
K1 Endoscopía capsular
K1 Enfermedad celíaca
K1 Enfermedad de Crohn
AB AIM To analyze the diagnostic yield (DY), therapeutic impact (TI) and safety of capsule endoscopy (CE). METHODS This is a multi-centre, observational, analytical, retrospective study. A total of 163 patients with suspicion of celiac disease (CD) (mean age = 46.4 ± 17.3 years, 68.1% women) who underwent CE from 2003 to 2015 were included. Patients were divided into four groups: seronegative CD with atrophy (Group- ?, n = 19), seropositive CD without atrophy (Group- ?, n = 39), contraindication to gastroscopy (Group-?, n = 6), seronegative CD without atrophy, but with a compatible context (Group-?, n = 99). DY, TI and the safety of CE were analysed. RESULTS The overall DY was 54% and the final diagnosis was villous atrophy (n = 65, 39.9%), complicated CD (n = 12, 7.4%) and other enteropathies (n = 11, 6.8%; 8 Crohn's). DY for groups ? to ? was 73.7%, 69.2%, 50% and 44.4%, respectively. Atrophy was located in duodenum in 24 cases (36.9%), diffuse in 19 (29.2%), jejunal in 11 (16.9%), and patchy in 10 cases (15.4%). Factors associated with a greater DY were positive serology (68.3% vs 49.2%, P = 0.034) and older age (P = 0.008). On the other hand, neither sex nor clinical presentation, family background, positive histology or HLA status were associated with DY. CE results changed the therapeutic approach in 71.8% of the cases. Atrophy was associated with a greater TI (92.3% vs 45.3%, P < 0.001) and 81.9% of the patients responded to diet. There was one case of capsule retention (0.6%). Agreement between CE findings and subsequent histology was 100% for diagnosing normal/other conditions, 70% for suspected CD and 50% for complicated CD. CONCLUSION CE has a high DY in cases of suspicion of CD and it leads to changes in the clinical course of the disease. CE is safe procedure with a high degree of concordance with histology and it helps in the differential diagnosis of CD. © The Author(s) 2017. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
PB Baishideng Publishing Group
SN 1007-9327
YR 2017
FD 2017-01-28
LK http://hdl.handle.net/10668/2649
UL http://hdl.handle.net/10668/2649
LA es
NO Luján-Sanchis  M, Pérez-Cuadrado-Robles E, García-Lledó J, Juanmartiñena Fernández JF, Elli L, Jiménez-García  V A, Egea-Valenzuela J, et al. Role of capsule endoscopy in suspected celiac disease: A European multi-centre study. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2017;23(4):703-711
DS RISalud
RD Apr 10, 2025