%0 Journal Article
%A de Labry Lima, Antonio Olry
%A Bermudez Tamayo, Clara
%A Pastor Moreno, Guadalupe
%A Bolivar Munoz, Julia
%A Ruiz Perez, Isabel
%A Johri, Mira
%A Quesada Jimenez, Fermin
%A Cruz Vela, Pilar
%A de Los Rios Alvarez, M.
%A Prados Quel, Miguel Angel
%A Moratalla Lopez, Enrique
%A Dominguez Martin, Susana
%A Lopez de Hierro, Jose Andres
%A Ricci Cabello, Ignacio
%T Effectiveness of an intervention to improve diabetes self-management on clinical outcomes in patients with low educational level
%D 2017
%@ 0213-9111
%U http://hdl.handle.net/10668/18786
%X Objective: To determine whether an intervention based on patient-practitioner communication is more effective than usual care in improving diabetes self-management in patients with type 2 diabetes with low educational level.Methods: 12-month, pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial. Nine physicians and 184 patients registered at two practices in a deprived area of Granada (Andalusia, Spain) participated in the study. Adult patients with type 2 diabetes, low educational level and glycated haemoglobin (HbAlc) > 7% (53.01 mmol/mol) were eligible. The physicians in the intervention group received training on communication skills and the use of a tool for monitoring glycaemic control and providing feedback to patients. The control group continued standard care. The primary outcome was difference in HbAl c after 12 months. Dyslipidaemia, blood pressure, body mass index and waist circumference were also assessed as secondary outcomes. Two-level (patient and provider) regression analyses controlling for sex, social support and comorbidity were conducted.Results: The HbAl c levels at 12 months decreased in both groups. Multilevel analysis showed a greater improvement in the intervention group (between-group HbAl c difference=0.16; p = 0.049). No statistically significant differences between groups were observed for dyslipidaemia, blood pressure, body mass index and waist circumference.Conclusions: In this pragmatic study, a simple and inexpensive intervention delivered in primary care showed a modest benefit in glycaemic control compared with usual care, although no effect was observed in the secondary outcomes. Further research is needed to design and assess interventions to promote diabetes self-management in socially vulnerable patients. (C) 2016 SESPAS. Published by Elsevier Espaila, S.L.U.
%K Diabetes mellitus type 2
%K Primary health care
%K Health inequalities
%K Self care
%K Randomised controlled trial
%K Socioeconomic inequalities
%K Care
%K Mellitus
%K Prevalence
%K Americans
%K Position
%K Women
%K Trial
%~