RT Journal Article T1 Diagnostic screening of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria: Prospective multicentric evaluation of the current medical indications. A1 Morado, Marta A1 Freire Sandes, Alex A1 Colado, Enrique A1 Subirá, Dolores A1 Isusi, Paloma A1 Soledad Noya, María A1 Belén Vidriales, María A1 Sempere, Amparo A1 Ángel Díaz, José A1 Minguela, Alfredo A1 Álvarez, Beatriz A1 Serrano, Cristina A1 Caballero, Teresa A1 Rey, Mercedes A1 Pérez Corral, Ana A1 Cristina Fernández Jiménez, María A1 Magro, Elena A1 Lemes, Angelina A1 Benavente, Celina A1 Bañas, Helena A1 Merino, Juana A1 Castejon, Celine A1 Gutierrez, Olivier A1 Rabasa, Pilar A1 Vescosi Gonçalves, Matheus A1 Perez-Andres, Martin A1 Orfao, Alberto A1 PNH working group of the Iberian Society of Cytometry (SIC), K1 flow cytometry K1 fluorescence cytometry K1 hematology K1 myelodysplastic syndrome K1 standardization AB Although consensus guidelines have been proposed in 2010 for the diagnostic screening of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) by flow cytometry (FCM), so far no study has investigated the efficiency of such medical indications in multicentric vs. reference laboratory settings. Here we evaluate the efficiency of consensus medical indications for PNH testing in 3,938 peripheral blood samples submitted to FCM testing in 24 laboratories in Spain and one reference center in Brazil. Overall, diagnostic screening based on consensus medical indications was highly efficient (14% of PNH+ samples) both in the multicenter setting in Spain (10%) and the reference laboratory in Brazil (16%). The highest frequency of PNH+ cases was observed among patients screened because of bone marrow (BM) failure syndrome (33%), particularly among those with aplastic anemia (AA; 45%) and to a less extent also a myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS; 10%). Among the other individuals studied, the most efficient medical indications for PNH screening included: hemolytic anemia (19%), hemoglobinuria (48%) and unexplained cytopenias (9%). In contrast, only a minor fraction of the patients who had been submitted for PNH testing because of unexplained thrombosis in the absence of cytopenia, were positive (0.4%). In summary, our results demonstrate that the current medical indications for PNH screening by FCM are highly efficient, although improved screening algorithms are needed for patients presenting with thrombosis and normal blood cell counts. © 2016 International Clinical Cytometry Society. YR 2016 FD 2016-10-01 LK http://hdl.handle.net/10668/10420 UL http://hdl.handle.net/10668/10420 LA en DS RISalud RD Jul 30, 2025