RT Journal Article
T1 How a deliberative approach includes women in the decisions of screening mammography: a citizens' jury feasibility study in Andalusia, Spain.
A1 Baena-Cañada, José M
A1 Luque-Ribelles, Violeta
A1 Quílez-Cutillas, Alicia
A1 Rosado-Varela, Petra
A1 Benítez-Rodríguez, Encarnación
A1 Márquez-Calderón, Soledad
A1 Rivera-Bautista, Juan Manuel
K1 breast tumours
K1 health policy
K1 public health
K1 qualitative research
AB To verify whether a citizens' jury study is feasible to the Andalusian population and to know if women, when better informed, are able to answer the research question of whether the Andalusian Public Health System must continue offering screening mammography to women aged 50-69. The reasons for the pertinent decision and recommendations to the political authorities will be stated. Qualitative research study with the methodology of citizens' jury. Breast cancer screening programme in Andalusia (Spain). Thirteen women aged 50-69 with secondary school or higher education accepted to participate as a jury. Two epidemiologists were the expert witnesses. The main researcher was the neutral moderator. Jury met on Monday, 15 February 2016. The moderator indicated to the jury that it had to assess the screening programme's key benefits and main harm. On Tuesday, 16 February, the expert witnesses positioned for and against the programme. On Thursday, 18 February, the jury deliberated, reached final conclusions, submitted its vote and stated its recommendations to politicians. The deliberation session was transcribed and analysed with the support of ATLAS.ti.5.2 software. Feasibility in the Andalusian population, women's vote and opinion, reasons for votes and recommendations to political authorities. Eleven participants voted yes and two voted no. There are three reasons to vote 'yes': health, the test nature, and individual freedom. Some women invoke the lack of efficacy and the cost to justify their negative vote, at least in universal terms. On completion, they made suggestions to be submitted to the pertinent authorities for the improvement of information, psychology services and research. The deliberative strategy is feasible and causes a favourable positioning regarding screening mammography, although information changes the opinion of some women, who desire informed decision making and to keep or increase medicalisation in their lives.
YR 2018
FD 2018-05-05
LK http://hdl.handle.net/10668/12428
UL http://hdl.handle.net/10668/12428
LA en
DS RISalud
RD Apr 8, 2025