RT Journal Article
T1 Evolución de los pacientes portadores de desfibrilador como prevención primaria tras un episodio de tormenta arrítmica
T2 Electrical storm in patients with prophylactic defibrillator implantation
A1 Rodríguez-Mañero, Moisés
A1 González-Cambeiro, Cristina
A1 Moreno-Arribas, Jose
A1 Expósito-García, Víctor
A1 Sánchez-Gómez, Juan Miguel
A1 González-Torres, Luis
A1 Arce-León, Álvaro
A1 Arguedas-Jiménez, Hugo
A1 Gaztañaga, Larraitz
A1 Salvador-Montañés, Oscar
A1 Iglesias-Bravo, Jose Antonio
A1 Huerta, Ana Andrés La
A1 Fernández-Armenta, Juan
A1 Arias, Miguel Ángel
A1 Martínez-Sande, Luis
K1 Desfibrilador automático implantable
K1 Electrical storm
K1 España
K1 Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
K1 Miocardiopatía
K1 Muerte súbita cardiaca
K1 Myocardiopathy
K1 Sudden cardiac death. Spain
K1 Tormenta arrítmica
AB Little is known about the prevalence of electrical storm, baseline characteristics and mortality implications of patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillator in primary prevention versus those patients without electrical storm. We sought to assess the prevalence, baseline risk profile and survival significance of electrical storm in patients with implantable defibrillator for primary prevention. Retrospective multicenter study performed in 15 Spanish hospitals. Consecutives patients referred for desfibrillator implantation, with or without left ventricular lead (at least those performed in 2010 and 2011), were included. Over all 1,174 patients, 34 (2,9%) presented an electrical storm, mainly due to ventricular tachycardia (82.4%). There were no significant baseline differences between groups, with similar punctuation in the mortality risk scores (SHOCKED, MADIT and FADES). A clear trigger was identified in 47% of the events. During the study period (38±21 months), long-term total mortality (58.8% versus 14.4%, p In the present study of patients with desfibrillator implantation for primary prevention, prevalence of electrical storm was 2.9%. There were no baseline differences in the cardiovascular risk profile versus those without electrical storm. However, all cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality was increased in these patients versus control desfibrillator patients without electrical storm, as was the rate of inappropriate desfibrillator intervention.
YR 2015
FD 2015-06-09
LK http://hdl.handle.net/10668/9883
UL http://hdl.handle.net/10668/9883
LA es
NO Rodríguez-Mañero, M., González-Cambeiro, C., Moreno-Arribas, J., Expósito-García, V., Sánchez-Gómez, J. M., González-Torres, L. et al. (2016). Evolución de los pacientes portadores de desfibrilador como prevención primaria tras un episodio de tormenta arrítmica [Electrical storm in patients with prophylactic defibrillator implantation]. Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico, 86(1), 26–34.
DS RISalud
RD Apr 7, 2025