RT Journal Article T1 Bronchoscopist's perception of the quality of the single-use bronchoscope (Ambu aScope4™) in selected bronchoscopies: a multicenter study in 21 Spanish pulmonology services A1 Flandes, Javier A1 Giraldo-Cadavid, Luis Fernando A1 Alfayate, Javier A1 Fernández-Navamuel, Iker A1 Agusti, Carlos A1 Lucena, Carmen M. A1 Rosell, Antoni A1 Andreo, Felipe A1 Centeno, Carmen A1 Montero, Carmen A1 Vidal, Iria A1 García-Alfonso, Lucía A1 Bango, Antonio A1 Ariza, Miguel A1 Gallego, Rocío A1 Orta, Marta A1 Bello, Salvador A1 Mincholé, Elisa A1 Torrego, Alfons A1 Pajares, Virginia A1 González, Héctor A1 Wangüemert, Aurelio Luis A1 Pérez-Izquierdo, Julio A1 Disdier, Carlos A1 de Vega Sanchez, Blanca A1 Cordovilla, Rosa A1 Cascón, Juan A1 Cruz, Antonio A1 García-López, J. Javier A1 Puente, Luis A1 Benedetti, Paola A1 García-Gallo, Cristina L. A1 Díaz Nuevo, Gema A1 Aguado, Silvia A1 Partida, Concepción A1 Díaz-Agero, Prudencio A1 Luque Crespo, Estefanía A1 Pavón, María A1 Páez, Francisco A1 Cases, Enrique A1 Martínez, Raquel A1 Briones, Andrés A1 Fernández, Cleofe A1 Martín Serrano, Concepción A1 Uribe-Hernández, Ana Maria A1 Robles, Jose K1 Bronchoscopy K1 Quality K1 CUSUM analysis K1 aScope4™ K1 Bronchoalveolar lavage AB Background: The disposable bronchoscope is an excellent alternative to face the problem of SARS-CoV-2 and other cross infections, but the bronchoscopist's perception of its quality has not been evaluated.Methods: To evaluate the quality of the Ambu-aScope4 disposable bronchoscope, we carried out a cross-sectional study in 21 Spanish pulmonology services. We use a standardized questionnaire completed by the bronchoscopists at the end of each bronchoscopy. The variables were described with absolute and relative frequencies, measures of central tendency and dispersion depending on their nature. The existence of learning curves was evaluated by CUSUM analysis.Results: The most frequent indications in 300 included bronchoscopies was bronchial aspiration in 69.3% and the median duration of these was 9.1 min. The route of entry was nasal in 47.2% and oral in 34.1%. The average score for ease of use, image, and aspiration quality was 80/100. All the planned techniques were performed in 94.9% and the bronchoscopist was satisfied in 96.6% of the bronchoscopies. They highlighted the portability and immediacy of the aScope4TM to start the procedure in 99.3%, the possibility of taking and storing images in 99.3%. The CUSUM analysis showed average scores > 70/100 from the first procedure and from the 9th procedure more than 80% of the scores exceeded the 80/100 score.Conclusions: The aScope4™ scored well for ease of use, imaging, and aspiration. We found a learning curve with excellent scores from the 9th procedure. Bronchoscopists highlighted its portability, immediacy of use and the possibility of taking and storing images. PB BioMed Central YR 2020 FD 2020-12-02 LK http://hdl.handle.net/10668/3431 UL http://hdl.handle.net/10668/3431 LA en NO Flandes J, Giraldo-Cadavid LF, Alfayate J, Fernández-Navamuel I, Agusti C, Lucena CM, et al. Bronchoscopist's perception of the quality of the single-use bronchoscope (Ambu aScope4™) in selected bronchoscopies: a multicenter study in 21 Spanish pulmonology services. Respir Res. 2020 Dec 2;21(1):320. NO This study has been designed by the bronchoscopy unit of the Jiménez Díaz Foundation sponsored by Ambu (Copenhagen, Denmark). However, the sponsors did not participate in the analysis and interpretation of the results. DS RISalud RD Apr 8, 2025