RT Journal Article
T1 Endoscopic ultrasound in gastric cancer staging before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A comparison with PET-CT in a clinical series.
A1 Redondo-Cerezo, Eduardo
A1 Martínez-Cara, Juan Gabriel
A1 Jiménez-Rosales, Rita
A1 Valverde-López, Francisco
A1 Caballero-Mateos, Antonio
A1 Jérvez-Puente, Pablo
A1 Ariza-Fernández, Jose Luis
A1 Úbeda-Muñoz, Margarita
A1 López-de-Hierro, Mercedes
A1 de Teresa, Javier
K1 EUS
K1 Gastric cancer staging
K1 PET-CT
K1 gastric preoperative evaluation
K1 restaging
AB Treatment of gastric cancer is based on accurate staging. Emerging methods, such as PET-CT, are increasingly being used for this purpose. Our aim was to analyze the results of EUS and PET-CT in staging and restaging our patients with gastric cancer, comparing both of them with the histological results. Patients with confirmed gastric cancer were prospectively enrolled. Inclusion criteria for the final analysis included only patients who finally received a surgical resection. All patients underwent preoperative TNM staging by means of EUS and PET-CT within 21 days prior to the surgical treatment. A total of 256 patients were included. The overall EUS accuracy for T staging was 78% and 80.2% in restaging. EUS showed its best accuracy when distinguishing T1-T2 tumors vs. T3-T4, with an increased accuracy in restaging. Regarding N staging, the overall accuracy of EUS was 76.2%, and 72.5% for PET-CT (p = 0.02). With regards to restaging, accuracy of EUS and PET-CT for N staging was 88.5% and 69%, respectively, with significant differences (p  EUS performed better than PET-CT in gastric cancer N staging and restaging. EUS accuracy in this setting is still suboptimal and probably more than one single diagnostic procedure should be used.
SN 2050-6406
YR 2016
FD 2016-12-12
LK http://hdl.handle.net/10668/11514
UL http://hdl.handle.net/10668/11514
LA en
DS RISalud
RD Apr 11, 2025