RT Journal Article T1 Adherence to the mediterranean diet and lymphoma risk in the european prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition. A1 Solans, Marta A1 Benavente, Yolanda A1 Saez, Marc A1 Agudo, Antonio A1 Naudin, Sabine A1 Hosnijeh, Fatemeh Saberi A1 Noh, Hwayoung A1 Freisling, Heinz A1 Ferrari, Pietro A1 Besson, Caroline A1 Mahamat-Saleh, Yahya A1 Boutron-Ruault, Marie-Christine A1 Kühn, Tilman A1 Kaaks, Rudolf A1 Boeing, Heiner A1 Lasheras, Cristina A1 Rodríguez-Barranco, Miguel A1 Amiano, Pilar A1 Huerta, Jose Maria A1 Barricarte, Aurelio A1 Schmidt, Julie A A1 Vineis, Paolo A1 Riboli, Elio A1 Trichopoulou, Antonia A1 Bamia, Christina A1 Peppa, Eleni A1 Masala, Giovanna A1 Agnoli, Claudia A1 Tumino, Rosario A1 Sacerdote, Carlotta A1 Panico, Salvatore A1 Skeie, Guri A1 Weiderpass, Elisabete A1 Jerkeman, Mats A1 Ericson, Ulrika A1 Späth, Florentin A1 Nilsson, Lena Maria A1 Dahm, Christina C A1 Overvad, Kim A1 Bolvig, Anne Katrine A1 Tjønneland, Anne A1 de Sanjose, Silvia A1 Buckland, Genevieve A1 Vermeulen, Roel A1 Nieters, Alexandra A1 Casabonne, Delphine K1 Europe K1 Mediterranean diet K1 lymphoma K1 prospective studies K1 risk AB There is a growing evidence of the protective role of the Mediterranean diet (MD) on cancer. However, no prospective study has yet investigated its influence on lymphoma. We evaluated the association between adherence to the MD and risk of lymphoma and its subtypes in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study. The analysis included 476,160 participants, recruited from 10 European countries between 1991 and 2001. Adherence to the MD was estimated through the adapted relative MD (arMED) score excluding alcohol. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used while adjusting for potential confounders. During an average follow-up of 13.9 years, 3,136 lymphomas (135 Hodgkin lymphoma [HL], 2,606 non-HL and 395 lymphoma not otherwise specified) were identified. Overall, a 1-unit increase in the arMED score was associated with a 2% lower risk of lymphoma (95% CI: 0.97; 1.00, p-trend = 0.03) while a statistically nonsignificant inverse association between a high versus low arMED score and risk of lymphoma was observed (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.91 [95% CI 0.80; 1.03], p-trend = 0.12). Analyses by lymphoma subtype did not reveal any statistically significant associations. Albeit with small numbers of cases (N = 135), a suggestive inverse association was found for HL (HR 1-unit increase = 0.93 [95% CI: 0.86; 1.01], p-trend = 0.07). However, the study may have lacked statistical power to detect small effect sizes for lymphoma subtype. Our findings suggest that an increasing arMED score was inversely related to the risk of overall lymphoma in EPIC but not by subtypes. Further large prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings. YR 2019 FD 2019-02-05 LK http://hdl.handle.net/10668/13358 UL http://hdl.handle.net/10668/13358 LA en DS RISalud RD Apr 14, 2025