RT Journal Article
T1 Expert Statements on the Standard of Care in Critically Ill Adult Patients With Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome.
A1 Azoulay, Elie
A1 Knoebl, Paul
A1 Garnacho-Montero, José
A1 Rusinova, Katerina
A1 Galstian, Gennadii
A1 Eggimann, Philippe
A1 Abroug, Fekri
A1 Benoit, Dominique
A1 von Bergwelt-Baildon, Michael
A1 Wendon, Julia
A1 Scully, Marie
K1 atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome
K1 eculizumab
K1 intensive care
K1 organ failure
K1 plasma exchange
K1 thrombocytopenia
K1 thrombotic microangiopathy
AB A typical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) presents similarly to thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) and other causes or conditions with thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA), such as disseminated intravascular coagulation or sepsis. Similarity in clinical presentation may hinder diagnosis and optimal treatment selection in the urgent setting in the ICU. However, there is currently no consensus on the diagnosis or treatment of aHUS for ICU specialists. This review aims to summarize available data on the diagnosis and treatment strategies of aHUS in the ICU to enhance the understanding of aHUS diagnosis and outcomes in patients managed in the ICU. To this end, a review of the recent literature (January 2009-March 2016) was performed to select the most relevant articles for ICU physicians. Based on the paucity of adult aHUS cases overall and within the ICU, no specific recommendations could be formally graded for the critical care setting. However, we recognize a core set of skills required by intensivists for diagnosing and managing patients with aHUS: recognizing thrombotic microangiopathies, differentiating aHUS from related conditions, recognizing involvement of other organ systems, understanding the pathophysiology of aHUS, knowing the diagnostic workup and relevant outcomes in critically ill patients with aHUS, and knowing the standard of care for patients with aHUS based on available data and guidelines. In conclusion, managing critically ill patients with aHUS requires basic skills that, in the absence of sufficient data from patients treated within the ICU, can be gleaned from an increasingly relevant literature outside the ICU. More data on critically ill patients with aHUS are needed to validate these conclusions within the ICU setting.
YR 2017
FD 2017-04-23
LK http://hdl.handle.net/10668/11130
UL http://hdl.handle.net/10668/11130
LA en
DS RISalud
RD Apr 9, 2025