RT Journal Article
T1 Recommendations for effective documentation in regional anesthesia: an expert panel Delphi consensus project.
A1 Ahmed, Hassan M
A1 Atterton, Benjamin P
A1 Crowe, Gillian G
A1 Barratta, Jaime L
A1 Johnson, Mark
A1 Viscusi, Eugene
A1 Adhikary, Sanjib
A1 Albrecht, Eric
A1 Boretsky, Karen
A1 Boublik, Jan
A1 Breslin, Dara S
A1 Byrne, Kelly
A1 Ch'ng, Alan
A1 Chuan, Alwin
A1 Conroy, Patrick
A1 Daniel, Craig
A1 Daszkiewicz, Andrzej
A1 Delbos, Alain
A1 Dirzu, Dan Sebastian
A1 Dmytriiev, Dmytro
A1 Fennessy, Paul
A1 Fischer, H Barrie J
A1 Frizelle, Henry
A1 Gadsden, Jeff
A1 Gautier, Philippe
A1 Gupta, Rajnish K
A1 Gürkan, Yavuz
A1 Hardman, Harold David
A1 Harrop-Griffiths, William
A1 Hebbard, Peter
A1 Hernandez, Nadia
A1 Hlasny, Jakub
A1 Iohom, Gabriella
A1 Ip, Vivian H Y
A1 Jeng, Christina L
A1 Johnson, Rebecca L
A1 Kalagara, Hari
A1 Kinirons, Brian
A1 Lansdown, Andrew Kenneth
A1 Leng, Jody C
A1 Lim, Yean Chin
A1 Lobo, Clara
A1 Ludwin, Danielle B
A1 Macfarlane, Alan James Robert
A1 Machi, Anthony T
A1 Mahon, Padraig
A1 Mannion, Stephen
A1 McLeod, David H
A1 Merjavy, Peter
A1 Miscuks, Aleksejs
A1 Mitchell, Christopher H
A1 Moka, Eleni
A1 Moran, Peter
A1 Ngui, Ann
A1 Nin, Olga C
A1 O'Donnell, Brian D
A1 Pawa, Amit
A1 Perlas, Anahi
A1 Porter, Steven
A1 Pozek, John-Paul
A1 Rebelo, Humberto C
A1 Roqués, Vicente
A1 Schroeder, Kristopher M
A1 Schwartz, Gary
A1 Schwenk, Eric S
A1 Sermeus, Luc
A1 Shorten, George
A1 Srinivasan, Karthikeyan
A1 Stevens, Markus F
A1 Theodoraki, Kassiani
A1 Turbitt, Lloyd R
A1 Valdés-Vilches, Luis Fernando
A1 Volk, Thomas
A1 Webster, Katrina
A1 Wiesmann, T
A1 Wilson, Sylvia H
A1 Wolmarans, Morné
A1 Woodworth, Glenn
A1 Worek, Andrew K
A1 Moran, E M Louise
K1 Delphi process
K1 anesthesia
K1 documentation
K1 international consensus
K1 minimum standards
K1 nerve block
K1 neuraxial
K1 regional anesthesia
AB Documentation is important for quality improvement, education, and research. There is currently a lack of recommendations regarding key aspects of documentation in regional anesthesia. The aim of this study was to establish recommendations for documentation in regional anesthesia. Following the formation of the executive committee and a directed literature review, a long list of potential documentation components was created. A modified Delphi process was then employed to achieve consensus amongst a group of international experts in regional anesthesia. This consisted of 2 rounds of anonymous electronic voting and a final virtual round table discussion with live polling on items not yet excluded or accepted from previous rounds. Progression or exclusion of potential components through the rounds was based on the achievement of strong consensus. Strong consensus was defined as ≥75% agreement and weak consensus as 50%-74% agreement. Seventy-seven collaborators participated in both rounds 1 and 2, while 50 collaborators took part in round 3. In total, experts voted on 83 items and achieved a strong consensus on 51 items, weak consensus on 3 and rejected 29. By means of a modified Delphi process, we have established expert consensus on documentation in regional anesthesia.
YR 2022
FD 2022-02-22
LK http://hdl.handle.net/10668/20167
UL http://hdl.handle.net/10668/20167
LA en
DS RISalud
RD Apr 12, 2025