Prevalence of Neural Autoantibodies in Epilepsy of Unknown Etiology: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

dc.contributor.authorCabezudo-García, Pablo
dc.contributor.authorMena-Vázquez, Natalia
dc.contributor.authorCiano-Petersen, Nicolás L
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Martín, Guillermina
dc.contributor.authorEstivill-Torrús, Guillermo
dc.contributor.authorSerrano-Castro, Pedro J
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-07T14:00:46Z
dc.date.available2025-01-07T14:00:46Z
dc.date.issued2021-03-19
dc.description.abstractThe prevalence of neural autoantibodies in epilepsy of unknown etiology varies among studies. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the pooled global prevalence and the prevalence for each antibody. A systematic search was conducted for studies that included prospectively patients ≥16 years old with epilepsy of unknown etiology and systematically determined neural autoantibodies. A meta-analysis was undertaken to estimate pooled prevalence in total patients with a positive result for at least one neural autoantibody in serum and/or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and for each autoantibody. Ten of the eleven studies that met the inclusion criteria and a total of 1302 patients with epilepsy of unknown etiology were included in themeta-analysis. The global pooled prevalence (IC95%) was 7.6% (4.6-11.2) in a total of 82 patients with a positive result for any neural autoantibody. None of the controls available in the studies had a positive result. Individual pooled prevalence for each autoantibody was: glycine receptor (GlyR) (3.2%), glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) (1.9%), N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) (1.8%), leucine-rich glioma inactivated-1 protein (LGI1) (1.1%), contactin-2-associated protein (CASPR2) (0.6%) and onconeuronal (0.2%). The pooled prevalence of neural autoantibodies in patients with epilepsy of unknown etiology is small but not irrelevant. None of the controls had a positive result. There was high heterogeneity among studies. In the future, a homogeneous protocol for testing neural autoantibodies is recommended.
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/brainsci11030392
dc.identifier.issn2076-3425
dc.identifier.pmcPMC8003737
dc.identifier.pmid33808902
dc.identifier.pubmedURLhttps://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8003737/pdf
dc.identifier.unpaywallURLhttps://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/11/3/392/pdf?version=1616383955
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10668/26056
dc.issue.number3
dc.journal.titleBrain sciences
dc.journal.titleabbreviationBrain Sci
dc.language.isoen
dc.organizationInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga - Plataforma Bionand (IBIMA)
dc.organizationSAS - Hospital Universitario Regional de Málaga
dc.organizationInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga - Plataforma Bionand (IBIMA)
dc.pubmedtypeJournal Article
dc.pubmedtypeReview
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectantibodies
dc.subjectautoantibodies
dc.subjectautoimmune epilepsy
dc.subjectepilepsy
dc.subjectneural autoantibodies
dc.subjectprevalence
dc.titlePrevalence of Neural Autoantibodies in Epilepsy of Unknown Etiology: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
dc.typeresearch article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.volume.number11

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
PMC8003737.pdf
Size:
1.28 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format