Enterococcus faecalis Endocarditis and Outpatient Treatment: A Systematic Review of Current Alternatives.

dc.contributor.authorHerrera-Hidalgo, Laura
dc.contributor.authorde Alarcón, Arístides
dc.contributor.authorLópez-Cortes, Luis E
dc.contributor.authorLuque-Márquez, Rafael
dc.contributor.authorLópez-Cortes, Luis F
dc.contributor.authorGutiérrez-Valencia, Alicia
dc.contributor.authorGil-Navarro, María V
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-07T16:51:24Z
dc.date.available2025-01-07T16:51:24Z
dc.date.issued2020-09-30
dc.description.abstractThe selection of the best alternative for Enterococcus faecalis infective endocarditis (IE) continuation treatment in the outpatient setting is still challenging. Three databases were searched, reporting antibiotic therapies against E. faecalis IE in or suitable for the outpatient setting. Articles the results of which were identified by species and treatment regimen were included. The quality of the studies was assessed accordingly with the study design. Data were extracted and synthesized narratively. In total, 18 studies were included. The treatment regimens reported were classified regarding the main antibiotic used as regimen, based on Aminoglycosides, dual β-lactam, teicoplanin, daptomycin or dalbavancin or oral therapy. The regimens based on aminoglycosides and dual β-lactam combinations are the treatment alternatives which gather more evidence regarding their efficacy. Dual β-lactam is the preferred option for high level aminoglycoside resistance strains, and for to its reduced nephrotoxicity, while its adaptation to the outpatient setting has been poorly documented. Less evidence supports the remaining alternatives, but many of them have been successfully adapted to outpatient care. Teicoplanin and dalbavancin as well as oral therapy seem promising. Our work provides an extensive examination of the potential alternatives to E. faecalis IE useful for outpatient care. However, the insufficient evidence hampers the attempt to give a general recommendation.
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/antibiotics9100657
dc.identifier.issn2079-6382
dc.identifier.pmcPMC7600219
dc.identifier.pmid33007853
dc.identifier.pubmedURLhttps://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7600219/pdf
dc.identifier.unpaywallURLhttps://www.mdpi.com/2079-6382/9/10/657/pdf?version=1619589186
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10668/28032
dc.issue.number10
dc.journal.titleAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)
dc.journal.titleabbreviationAntibiotics (Basel)
dc.language.isoen
dc.organizationInstituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Granada (ibs.GRANADA)
dc.pubmedtypeJournal Article
dc.pubmedtypeReview
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectEnterococcus faecalis
dc.subjectinfective endocarditis
dc.subjectoutpatient parenteral antibiotic treatment (OPAT)
dc.subjectoutpatient treatment
dc.subjectsystematic review
dc.subjecttreatment alternatives
dc.titleEnterococcus faecalis Endocarditis and Outpatient Treatment: A Systematic Review of Current Alternatives.
dc.typeresearch article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.volume.number9

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
PMC7600219.pdf
Size:
1002.93 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format