Novel suturing technique, based on physical principles, achieves a breaking point double that obtained by conventional techniques.

dc.contributor.authorPérez Lara, Francisco Javier
dc.contributor.authorZubizarreta Jimenez, Rogelio
dc.contributor.authorMoya Donoso, Francisco Javier
dc.contributor.authorHernández Gonzalez, Jose Manuel
dc.contributor.authorPrieto-Puga Arjona, Tatiana
dc.contributor.authorMarín Moya, Ricardo
dc.contributor.authorPitarch Martinez, Maria
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-07T15:00:24Z
dc.date.available2025-01-07T15:00:24Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractSutures have been used to repair wounds since ancient times. However, the basic suture technique has not significantly changed. In Phase I of our project, we proposed a "double diabolo" suture design, using a theoretical physical study to show that this suture receives 50% less tension than conventional sutures, and so a correspondingly greater force must be applied to break it. To determine whether these theoretical levels of resistance were met by the new type of suture. An observational study was performed to compare three types of sutures, using a device that exerted force on the suture until the breaking point was reached. The tension produced by this traction was measured. The following variables were considered: Tearing stress on entry/exit points, edge separation stress, and suture break stress. The study sample consisted of 30 sutures with simple interrupted stitches (Group 1), 30 with continuous stitches (Group 2), and 30 with the "double diabolo" design (Group 3). The mean degree of force required to reach the breaking point for each of these variables (tearing, separation, and final breaking) was highest in Group 3 (14.56, 18.28, and 21.39 kg), followed by Group 1 (7.36, 10.38, and 12.81 kg) and Group 2 (5.77, 7.7, and 8.71 kg). These differences were statistically significant (P The experimental results show that with the "double diabolo" suture, compared with conventional sutures, greater force must be applied to reach the breaking point (almost twice as much as in the simple interrupted suture and more than double that required for the continuous suture). If these results are confirmed in Phase III (the clinical phase) of our study, we believe the double diabolo technique should be adopted as the standard approach, especially when the suture must withstand significant tension (e.g., laparotomy closure, thoracotomy closure, diaphragm suture, or hernial orifice closure).
dc.identifier.doi10.4240/wjgs.v13.i9.1039
dc.identifier.issn1948-9366
dc.identifier.pmcPMC8462086
dc.identifier.pmid34621479
dc.identifier.pubmedURLhttps://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8462086/pdf
dc.identifier.unpaywallURLhttps://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v13.i9.1039
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10668/26784
dc.issue.number9
dc.journal.titleWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery
dc.journal.titleabbreviationWorld J Gastrointest Surg
dc.language.isoen
dc.organizationSAS - Hospital de Antequera
dc.page.number1039-1049
dc.pubmedtypeJournal Article
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subjectPhysical principles
dc.subjectSuture
dc.subjectTechnique
dc.subjectTension
dc.titleNovel suturing technique, based on physical principles, achieves a breaking point double that obtained by conventional techniques.
dc.typeresearch article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.volume.number13

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
PMC8462086.pdf
Size:
6.26 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format