Daptomycin Plus Fosfomycin Versus Daptomycin Alone for Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia and Endocarditis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

dc.contributor.authorPujol, Miquel
dc.contributor.authorMiró, José-María
dc.contributor.authorShaw, Evelyn
dc.contributor.authorAguado, Jose-María
dc.contributor.authorSan-Juan, Rafael
dc.contributor.authorPuig-Asensio, Mireia
dc.contributor.authorPigrau, Carles
dc.contributor.authorCalbo, Esther
dc.contributor.authorMontejo, Miguel
dc.contributor.authorRodriguez-Álvarez, Regino
dc.contributor.authorGarcia-Pais, María-Jose
dc.contributor.authorPintado, Vicente
dc.contributor.authorEscudero-Sánchez, Rosa
dc.contributor.authorLopez-Contreras, Joaquín
dc.contributor.authorMorata, Laura
dc.contributor.authorMontero, Milagros
dc.contributor.authorAndrés, Marta
dc.contributor.authorPasquau, Juan
dc.contributor.authorArenas, María-Del-Mar
dc.contributor.authorPadilla, Belén
dc.contributor.authorMurillas, Javier
dc.contributor.authorJover-Sáenz, Alfredo
dc.contributor.authorLópez-Cortes, Luis-Eduardo
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Pardo, Graciano
dc.contributor.authorGasch, Oriol
dc.contributor.authorVidela, Sebastian
dc.contributor.authorHereu, Pilar
dc.contributor.authorTebé, Cristian
dc.contributor.authorPallarès, Natalia
dc.contributor.authorSanllorente, Mireia
dc.contributor.authorDomínguez, María-Ángeles
dc.contributor.authorCàmara, Jordi
dc.contributor.authorFerrer, Anna
dc.contributor.authorPadullés, Ariadna
dc.contributor.authorCuervo, Guillermo
dc.contributor.authorCarratalà, Jordi
dc.contributor.authorMRSA Bacteremia (BACSARM) Trial Investigators
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-07T14:22:51Z
dc.date.available2025-01-07T14:22:51Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractWe aimed to determine whether daptomycin plus fosfomycin provides higher treatment success than daptomycin alone for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia and endocarditis. A randomized (1:1) phase 3 superiority, open-label, and parallel group clinical trial of adult inpatients with MRSA bacteremia was conducted at 18 Spanish hospitals. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either 10 mg/kg of daptomycin intravenously daily plus 2 g of fosfomycin intravenously every 6 hours, or 10 mg/kg of daptomycin intravenously daily. Primary endpoint was treatment success 6 weeks after the end of therapy. Of 167 patients randomized, 155 completed the trial and were assessed for the primary endpoint. Treatment success at 6 weeks after the end of therapy was achieved in 40 of 74 patients who received daptomycin plus fosfomycin and in 34 of 81 patients who were given daptomycin alone (54.1% vs 42.0%; relative risk, 1.29 [95% confidence interval, .93-1.8]; P = .135). At 6 weeks, daptomycin plus fosfomycin was associated with lower microbiologic failure (0 vs 9 patients; P = .003) and lower complicated bacteremia (16.2% vs 32.1%; P = .022). Adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation occurred in 13 of 74 patients (17.6%) receiving daptomycin plus fosfomycin, and in 4 of 81 patients (4.9%) receiving daptomycin alone (P = .018). Daptomycin plus fosfomycin provided 12% higher rate of treatment success than daptomycin alone, but this difference did not reach statistical significance. This antibiotic combination prevented microbiological failure and complicated bacteremia, but it was more often associated with adverse events. NCT01898338.
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/cid/ciaa1081
dc.identifier.essn1537-6591
dc.identifier.pmcPMC8096235
dc.identifier.pmid32725216
dc.identifier.pubmedURLhttps://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8096235/pdf
dc.identifier.unpaywallURLhttps://academic.oup.com/cid/article-pdf/72/9/1517/37793691/ciaa1081.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10668/26334
dc.issue.number9
dc.journal.titleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America
dc.journal.titleabbreviationClin Infect Dis
dc.language.isoen
dc.organizationSAS - Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves
dc.organizationInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de Sevilla (IBIS)
dc.organizationSAS - Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío
dc.organizationSAS - Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena
dc.page.number1517-1525
dc.pubmedtypeJournal Article
dc.pubmedtypeRandomized Controlled Trial
dc.pubmedtypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectMRSA
dc.subjectbacteremia
dc.subjectclinical trial
dc.subjectdaptomycin
dc.subjectfosfomycin
dc.subject.meshAdult
dc.subject.meshAnti-Bacterial Agents
dc.subject.meshBacteremia
dc.subject.meshDaptomycin
dc.subject.meshEndocarditis
dc.subject.meshFosfomycin
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
dc.subject.meshStaphylococcal Infections
dc.subject.meshTreatment Outcome
dc.titleDaptomycin Plus Fosfomycin Versus Daptomycin Alone for Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia and Endocarditis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
dc.typeresearch article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.volume.number72

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
PMC8096235.pdf
Size:
748 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format