Reporting guideline for interventional trials of primary and incisional ventral hernia repair.

dc.contributor.authorParker, S G
dc.contributor.authorHalligan, S
dc.contributor.authorBerrevoet, F
dc.contributor.authorde Beaux, A C
dc.contributor.authorEast, B
dc.contributor.authorEker, H H
dc.contributor.authorJensen, K K
dc.contributor.authorJorgensen, L N
dc.contributor.authorMontgomery, A
dc.contributor.authorMorales-Conde, S
dc.contributor.authorMiserez, M
dc.contributor.authorRenard, Y
dc.contributor.authorSanders, D L
dc.contributor.authorSimons, M
dc.contributor.authorSlade, D
dc.contributor.authorTorkington, J
dc.contributor.authorBlackwell, S
dc.contributor.authorDames, N
dc.contributor.authorWindsor, A C J
dc.contributor.authorMallett, S
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-07T15:37:17Z
dc.date.available2025-01-07T15:37:17Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractPrimary and incisional ventral hernia trials collect unstandardized inconsistent data, limiting data interpretation and comparison. This study aimed to create two minimum data sets for primary and incisional ventral hernia interventional trials to standardize data collection and improve trial comparison. To support these data sets, standardized patient-reported outcome measures and trial methodology criteria were created. To construct these data sets, nominal group technique methodology was employed, involving 15 internationally recognized abdominal wall surgeons and two patient representatives. Initially a maximum data set was created from previous systematic and panellist reviews. Thereafter, three stages of voting took place: stage 1, selection of the number of variables for data set inclusion; stage 2, selection of variables to be included; and stage 3, selection of variable definitions and detection methods. A steering committee interpreted and analysed the data. The maximum data set contained 245 variables. The three stages of voting commenced in October 2019 and had been completed by July 2020. The final primary ventral hernia data set included 32 variables, the incisional ventral hernia data set included 40 variables, the patient-reported outcome measures tool contained 25 questions, and 40 methodological criteria were chosen. The best known variable definitions were selected for accurate variable description. CT was selected as the optimal preoperative descriptor of hernia morphology. Standardized follow-up at 30 days, 1 year, and 5 years was selected. These minimum data sets, patient-reported outcome measures, and methodological criteria have allowed creation of a manual for investigators aiming to undertake primary ventral hernia or incisional ventral hernia interventional trials. Adopting these data sets will improve trial methods and comparisons.
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/bjs/znab157
dc.identifier.essn1365-2168
dc.identifier.pmid34286842
dc.identifier.unpaywallURLhttps://academic.oup.com/bjs/article-pdf/108/9/1050/41771927/znab157.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10668/27275
dc.issue.number9
dc.journal.titleThe British journal of surgery
dc.journal.titleabbreviationBr J Surg
dc.language.isoen
dc.organizationSAS - Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío
dc.page.number1050-1055
dc.pubmedtypeJournal Article
dc.pubmedtypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.subject.meshAbdominal Wall
dc.subject.meshClinical Trials as Topic
dc.subject.meshFemale
dc.subject.meshHernia, Ventral
dc.subject.meshHerniorrhaphy
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshIncisional Hernia
dc.subject.meshLaparoscopy
dc.subject.meshMale
dc.subject.meshPractice Guidelines as Topic
dc.subject.meshRecurrence
dc.subject.meshSurgical Mesh
dc.subject.meshTreatment Outcome
dc.titleReporting guideline for interventional trials of primary and incisional ventral hernia repair.
dc.typeresearch article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.volume.number108

Files