Pyrosequencing versus methylation-specific PCR for assessment of MGMT methylation in tumor and blood samples of glioblastoma patients.
No Thumbnail Available
Identifiers
Date
2019-07-31
Authors
Estival, Anna
Sanz, Carolina
Ramirez, Jose-Luis
Velarde, Jose Maria
Domenech, Marta
Carrato, Cristina
de Las Peñas, Ramón
Gil-Gil, Miguel
Sepúlveda, Juan
Armengol, Roser
Advisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
Circulating biomarkers in blood may provide an interesting alternative to risky tissue biopsies in the diagnosis and follow-up of glioblastoma patients. We have assessed MGMT methylation status in blood and tissue samples from unresected glioblastoma patients who had been included in the randomized GENOM-009 trial. Paired blood and tissue samples were assessed by methylation-specific PCR (MSP) and pyrosequencing (PYR). After establishing the minimum PYR cut-off that could yield a significant difference in overall survival, we assessed the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value (NPV) of the analyses. Methylation could be detected in cfDNA by both MSP and PYR but with low concordance with results in tissue. Sensitivity was low for both methods (31% and 38%, respectively), while specificity was higher for MSP in blood than for PYR in plasma (96% vs 76%) and NPV was similar (56 vs 57%). Concordance of results in tissue by MSP and PYR was 84.3% (P
Description
MeSH Terms
Biomarkers
Brain Neoplasms
DNA Methylation
DNA Modification Methylases
DNA Repair Enzymes
Female
Glioblastoma
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Polymerase Chain Reaction
Sensitivity and Specificity
Tumor Suppressor Proteins
Brain Neoplasms
DNA Methylation
DNA Modification Methylases
DNA Repair Enzymes
Female
Glioblastoma
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Polymerase Chain Reaction
Sensitivity and Specificity
Tumor Suppressor Proteins