Concordance between the Clinical Definition of Polypathological Patient versus Automated Detection by Means of Combined Identification through ICD-9-CM Codes.
No Thumbnail Available
Identifiers
Date
2019-05-06
Authors
Gómez-Salgado, Juan
Bernabeu-Wittel, Máximo
Aguilera-González, Carmen
Goicoechea-Salazar, Juan Antonio
Larrocha, Daniel
Nieto-Martín, María Dolores
Moreno-Gaviño, Lourdes
Ollero-Baturone, Manuel
Advisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
It is unknown whether the digital application of automated ICD-9-CM codes recorded in the medical history are useful for a first screening in the detection of polypathological patients. In this study, the objective was to identify the degree of intra- and inter-observer concordance in the identification of in-patient polypathological patients between the standard clinical identification method and a new automatic method, using the basic minimum data set of ICD-9-CM codes in the digital medical history. For this, a cross-sectional multicenter study with 1518 administratively discharged patients from Andalusian hospitals during the period of 2013-2014 has been carried out. For the concordance between the clinical definition of a polypathological patient and the polypathological patient classification according to ICD-9-CM coding, a 0.661 kappa was obtained (95% confidence interval (CI); 0.622-0.701) with p
Description
MeSH Terms
DeCS Terms
CIE Terms
Keywords
ICD-9-CM, cost effectiveness, multimorbidity, multiple chronic conditions, patient safety, polypathological patient, population health management