Disbalancing Envelope Stress Responses as a Strategy for Sensitization of Escherichia coli to Antimicrobial Agents.

dc.contributor.authorRecacha, Esther
dc.contributor.authorFox, Valeria
dc.contributor.authorDíaz-Díaz, Sara
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Duque, Ana
dc.contributor.authorDocobo-Pérez, Fernando
dc.contributor.authorPascual, Álvaro
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez-Martínez, José Manuel
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-07T16:03:53Z
dc.date.available2025-01-07T16:03:53Z
dc.date.issued2021-04-07
dc.description.abstractDisbalancing envelope stress responses was investigated as a strategy for sensitization of Escherichia coli to antimicrobial agents. Seventeen isogenic strains were selected from the KEIO collection with deletions in genes corresponding to the σE, Cpx, Rcs, Bae, and Psp responses. Antimicrobial activity against 20 drugs with different targets was evaluated by disk diffusion and gradient strip tests. Growth curves and time-kill curves were also determined for selected mutant-antimicrobial combinations. An increase in susceptibility to ampicillin, ceftazidime, cefepime, aztreonam, ertapenem, and fosfomycin was detected. Growth curves for Psp response mutants showed a decrease in optical density (OD) using sub-MIC concentrations of ceftazidime and aztreonam (ΔpspA and ΔpspB mutants), cefepime (ΔpspB and ΔpspC mutants) and ertapenem (ΔpspB mutant). Time-kill curves were also performed using 1xMIC concentrations of these antimicrobials. For ceftazidime, 2.9 log10 (ΔpspA mutant) and 0.9 log10 (ΔpspB mutant) decreases were observed at 24 and 8 h, respectively. For aztreonam, a decrease of 3.1 log10 (ΔpspA mutant) and 4 log1010 (ΔpspB mutant) was shown after 4-6 h. For cefepime, 4.2 log10 (ΔpspB mutant) and 2.6 log10 (ΔpspC mutant) decreases were observed at 8 and 4 h, respectively. For ertapenem, a decrease of up to 6 log10 (ΔpspB mutant) was observed at 24 h. A deficient Psp envelope stress response increased E. coli susceptibility to beta-lactam agents such as cefepime, ceftazidime, aztreonam and ertapenem. Its role in repairing extensive inner membrane disruptions makes this pathway essential to bacterial survival, so that disbalancing the Psp response could be an appropriate target for sensitization strategies.
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fmicb.2021.653479
dc.identifier.issn1664-302X
dc.identifier.pmcPMC8058218
dc.identifier.pmid33897667
dc.identifier.pubmedURLhttps://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8058218/pdf
dc.identifier.unpaywallURLhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2021.653479/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10668/27596
dc.journal.titleFrontiers in microbiology
dc.journal.titleabbreviationFront Microbiol
dc.language.isoen
dc.organizationSAS - Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío
dc.organizationSAS - Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena
dc.organizationInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de Sevilla (IBIS)
dc.page.number653479
dc.pubmedtypeJournal Article
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectGram-negative bacteria
dc.subjectantimicrobial resistance
dc.subjectbacterial sensitization
dc.subjectbeta-lactams
dc.subjectenvelope stress responses
dc.titleDisbalancing Envelope Stress Responses as a Strategy for Sensitization of Escherichia coli to Antimicrobial Agents.
dc.typeresearch article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.volume.number12

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
PMC8058218.pdf
Size:
8.86 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format