Determinants of left ventricular ejection fraction and a novel method to improve its assessment of myocardial contractility.

dc.contributor.authorMonge García, Manuel Ignacio
dc.contributor.authorJian, Zhongping
dc.contributor.authorSettels, Jos J
dc.contributor.authorHunley, Charles
dc.contributor.authorCecconi, Maurizio
dc.contributor.authorHatib, Feras
dc.contributor.authorPinsky, Michael R
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-07T12:55:39Z
dc.date.available2025-01-07T12:55:39Z
dc.date.issued2019-04-16
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to quantify the impact of different cardiovascular factors on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and test a novel LVEF calculation considering these factors. 10 pigs were studied. The experimental protocol consisted of sequentially changing afterload, preload and contractility. LV pressure-volume (PV) loops and peripheral arterial pressure were obtained before and after each intervention. LVEF was calculated as stroke volume (SV)/end-diastolic volume (EDV). We studied global cardiac function variables: LV end-systolic elastance (Ees), effective arterial elastance (Ea), end-diastolic volume and heart rate. Diastolic function was evaluated by means of the ventricular relaxation time (τ) and ventricular stiffness constant (β) obtained from the end-diastolic PV relationship. Ventriculo-arterial coupling (VAC), an index of cardiovascular performance, was calculated as Ea/Ees. LV mechanical efficiency (LVeff) was calculated as the ratio of stroke work to LV pressure-volume area. A linear mixed model was used to determine the impact of cardiac factors (Ees, Ea, EDV and heart rate), VAC and LVeff on LVEF during all experimental conditions. LVEF was mainly related to Ees and Ea. There was a strong relationship between LVEF and both VAC and LVeff (r2 = 0.69 and r2 = 0.94, respectively). The relationship between LVEF and Ees was good (r2 = 0.43). Adjusting LVEF to afterload ([Formula: see text]) performed better for estimating Ees (r2 = 0.75) and improved the tracking of LV contractility changes, even when a peripheral Ea was used as surrogate (Ea = radial MAP/SV; r2 = 0.73). LVEF was mainly affected by contractility and afterload changes and was strongly related to VAC and LVeff. An adjustment to LVEF that considers the impact of afterload provided a better assessment of LV contractility.
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13613-019-0526-7
dc.identifier.issn2110-5820
dc.identifier.pmcPMC6468023
dc.identifier.pmid30993544
dc.identifier.pubmedURLhttps://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6468023/pdf
dc.identifier.unpaywallURLhttps://annalsofintensivecare.springeropen.com/track/pdf/10.1186/s13613-019-0526-7
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10668/25055
dc.issue.number1
dc.journal.titleAnnals of intensive care
dc.journal.titleabbreviationAnn Intensive Care
dc.language.isoen
dc.organizationSAS - Hospital Universitario de Jerez de la Frontera
dc.page.number48
dc.pubmedtypeJournal Article
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectAfterload
dc.subjectArterial elastance
dc.subjectContractility
dc.subjectDiastolic function
dc.subjectEjection fraction
dc.subjectPreload
dc.subjectSystolic function
dc.subjectVentricular efficiency
dc.subjectVentriculo-arterial coupling
dc.titleDeterminants of left ventricular ejection fraction and a novel method to improve its assessment of myocardial contractility.
dc.typeresearch article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.volume.number9

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
PMC6468023.pdf
Size:
2.19 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format