CON: Carbapenems are NOT necessary for all infections caused by ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales

No Thumbnail Available

Date

2021-02-23

Authors

Rodriguez-Bano, Jesus
Gutierrez-Gutierrez, Belen
Pascual, Alvaro

Advisors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Oxford univ press
Metrics
Google Scholar
Export

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

Carbapenems are considered the drugs of choice for the treatment of serious infections caused by ceftriaxoneresistant Enterobacterales. However, because of the dramatic increase in carbapenem-resistant organisms worldwide, finding alternatives to carbapenems is a must. The potential options include beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations, temocillin, cephamycins and some non-beta-lactamdrugs. The most controversial is piperacillin/tazobactam; the results of the MERINO trial are challenged because the isolates of patients with worse outcomes were frequently not susceptible to piperacillin/tazobactam when studied by reference methods, and also because the drug was not administered in extended infusion. Other potential options are briefly discussed. We conclude that carbapenems are not necessary for all patients with infections caused by ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales.

Description

MeSH Terms

DeCS Terms

CIE Terms

Keywords

Blood-stream infections, Escherichia-coli, Piperacillin-tazobactam, Klebsiella-pneumoniae, Efficacy, Antibiotics, Safety

Citation