Performance comparison of ventricular and arterial dP/dtmax for assessing left ventricular systolic function during different experimental loading and contractile conditions.

dc.contributor.authorMonge Garcia, Manuel Ignacio
dc.contributor.authorJian, Zhongping
dc.contributor.authorSettels, Jos J
dc.contributor.authorHunley, Charles
dc.contributor.authorCecconi, Maurizio
dc.contributor.authorHatib, Feras
dc.contributor.authorPinsky, Michael R
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-07T12:55:14Z
dc.date.available2025-01-07T12:55:14Z
dc.date.issued2018-11-29
dc.description.abstractMaximal left ventricular (LV) pressure rise (LV dP/dtmax), a classical marker of LV systolic function, requires LV catheterization, thus surrogate arterial pressure waveform measures have been proposed. We compared LV and arterial (femoral and radial) dP/dtmax to the slope of the LV end-systolic pressure-volume relationship (Ees), a load-independent measure of LV contractility, to determine the interactions between dP/dtmax and Ees as loading and LV contractility varied. We measured LV pressure-volume data using a conductance catheter and femoral and radial arterial pressures using a fluid-filled catheter in 10 anesthetized pigs. Ees was calculated as the slope of the end-systolic pressure-volume relationship during a transient inferior vena cava occlusion. Afterload was assessed by the effective arterial elastance. The experimental protocol consisted of sequentially changing afterload (phenylephrine/nitroprusside), preload (bleeding/fluid bolus), and contractility (esmolol/dobutamine). A linear-mixed analysis was used to assess the contribution of cardiac (Ees, end-diastolic volume, effective arterial elastance, heart rate, preload-dependency) and arterial factors (total vascular resistance and arterial compliance) to LV and arterial dP/dtmax. Both LV and arterial dP/dtmax allowed the tracking of Ees changes, especially during afterload and contractility changes, although arterial dP/dtmax was lower compared to LV dP/dtmax (bias 732 ± 539 mmHg⋅s- 1 for femoral dP/dtmax, and 625 ± 501 mmHg⋅s- 1 for radial dP/dtmax). Changes in cardiac contractility (Ees) were the main determinant of LV and arterial dP/dtmax changes. Although arterial dP/dtmax is a complex function of central and peripheral arterial factors, radial and particularly femoral dP/dtmax allowed reasonably good tracking of LV contractility changes as loading and inotropic conditions varied.
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13054-018-2260-1
dc.identifier.essn1466-609X
dc.identifier.pmcPMC6262953
dc.identifier.pmid30486866
dc.identifier.pubmedURLhttps://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6262953/pdf
dc.identifier.unpaywallURLhttps://ccforum.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/s13054-018-2260-1
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10668/25051
dc.issue.number1
dc.journal.titleCritical care (London, England)
dc.journal.titleabbreviationCrit Care
dc.language.isoen
dc.organizationSAS - Hospital Universitario de Jerez de la Frontera
dc.page.number325
dc.pubmedtypeJournal Article
dc.pubmedtypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectArterial pressure
dc.subjectContractility
dc.subjectLeft ventricular function
dc.subjectdP/dtmax
dc.subject.meshAdrenergic beta-1 Receptor Antagonists
dc.subject.meshAnimals
dc.subject.meshCardiotonic Agents
dc.subject.meshCatheterization, Central Venous
dc.subject.meshMyocardial Contraction
dc.subject.meshNitroprusside
dc.subject.meshPhenylephrine
dc.subject.meshPropanolamines
dc.subject.meshSwine
dc.subject.meshVasodilator Agents
dc.subject.meshVentricular Function, Left
dc.subject.meshWeights and Measures
dc.titlePerformance comparison of ventricular and arterial dP/dtmax for assessing left ventricular systolic function during different experimental loading and contractile conditions.
dc.typeresearch article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.volume.number22

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
PMC6262953.pdf
Size:
2.58 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format