From First Line to Sequential Treatment in the Management of Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer.

dc.contributor.authorMartín, Andrés Muñoz
dc.contributor.authorHidalgo, Manuel
dc.contributor.authorAlvarez, Rafael
dc.contributor.authorArrazubi, Virginia
dc.contributor.authorMartínez-Galán, Joaquina
dc.contributor.authorSalgado, Mercedes
dc.contributor.authorMacarulla, Teresa
dc.contributor.authorCarrato, Alfredo
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-07T14:05:14Z
dc.date.available2025-01-07T14:05:14Z
dc.date.issued2018-04-30
dc.description.abstractThe current management of patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) is based on systemic chemotherapy. The results of the MPACT and PRODIGE clinical trials have demonstrated that the combination of nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine (GEM) as well as FOLFIRINOX regimen result in improvement in overall survival when compared to GEM alone. Treatment guidelines now recommend either one of these two regimens as first line treatment for fit patients with mPDAC. Because no head-to-head comparison between the two regimens exists, the selection of one versus the other is based on clinical criteria. The design and eligibility criteria of these two clinical trials are dissimilar, making the results of the MPACT trial more applicable to the general population of patients with mPDAC. In addition, the combination of nab-paclitaxel and GEM is better tolerated and easier to administer in clinical practice than FOLFIRINOX. Furthermore, when the regimens are studied in comparable patient populations the efficacy results are very similar. Nanoliposomal irinotecan plus 5FU has recently demonstrated a significant increase in efficacy rates after a GEM-based treatment. Importantly, treatment of mPDAC should now be considered as a continuum care for patients who are fit, with second and even third line treatments. Different sequential treatment algorithms are proposed based on available data. In retrospective studies, patients who were managed with GEM-based regimens followed by fluoropyrimidine-based regimens appear to have the most favorable outcome.
dc.identifier.doi10.7150/jca.23716
dc.identifier.issn1837-9664
dc.identifier.pmcPMC5995948
dc.identifier.pmid29896283
dc.identifier.pubmedURLhttps://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5995948/pdf
dc.identifier.unpaywallURLhttp://www.jcancer.org/v09p1978.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10668/26128
dc.issue.number11
dc.journal.titleJournal of Cancer
dc.journal.titleabbreviationJ Cancer
dc.language.isoen
dc.organizationSAS - Hospital Universitario San Cecilio
dc.organizationSAS - Hospital Universitario San Cecilio
dc.organizationSAS - Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves
dc.page.number1978-1988
dc.pubmedtypeJournal Article
dc.pubmedtypeReview
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subjectFOLFIRINOX
dc.subjectchemotherapy
dc.subjectmetastatic disease
dc.subjectnab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine
dc.subjectpancreatic cancer
dc.subjectsequential treatment
dc.titleFrom First Line to Sequential Treatment in the Management of Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer.
dc.typeresearch article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.volume.number9

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
PMC5995948.pdf
Size:
508.66 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format