Characteristics, management and outcomes of atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome in kidney transplant patients: a retrospective national study.

dc.contributor.authorPortoles, José
dc.contributor.authorHuerta, Ana
dc.contributor.authorArjona, Emilia
dc.contributor.authorGavela, Eva
dc.contributor.authorAgüera, Marisa
dc.contributor.authorJiménez, Carlos
dc.contributor.authorCavero, Teresa
dc.contributor.authorMarrero, Domingo
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez de Córdoba, Santiago
dc.contributor.authorDiekmann, Fritz
dc.contributor.authorMatrix Investigators
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-07T13:41:11Z
dc.date.available2025-01-07T13:41:11Z
dc.date.issued2020-08-13
dc.description.abstractKidney transplantation (KTx) is a strong trigger for the development of either recurrent or de novo atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome (aHUS). According to previous studies, eculizumab (ECU) is effective for prophylaxis and for treatment of recurrence. We evaluated the experiences of Spanish patients with recurrent and de novo aHUS associated with KTx, treated or not treated with ECU. In the de novo group, we classified patients as having early de novo (during the first month) or late de novo aHUS (subsequent onset). We analysed 36 cases of aHUS associated with KTx. All of the 14 patients with pre-KTx diagnosis of aHUS were considered to have high or moderate risk of recurrence. Despite receiving grafts from suboptimal donors, prophylactic ECU was effective for avoiding recurrence. The drug was stopped only in two cases with low-moderate risk of recurrence and was maintained in high-risk patients with no single relapse. There were 22 de novo aHUS cases and 16 belonged to the early de novo group. The median time of onset in the late group was 3.4 years. The early group had a better response to ECU than the late group, probably due to earlier diagnosis and use of the drug. No genetic pathogenic variant was detected in de novo aHUS cases, suggesting a secondary profile of the disease. ECU was stopped in all de novo patients with no relapses. ECU was well tolerated in all cases. Both groups (pre-aHUS and de novo) presented different clinical profiles, management approaches and outcomes. One should consider aHUS regardless of time after KTx. Genetic studies are crucial to stratify risks of relapse and to determine necessary lengths of treatment. We suggest short ECU treatment for de novo cases without pathogenic mutation and that ECU treatment be considered pre-emptively for patients with moderate or high risk of recurrence.
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/ckj/sfaa096
dc.identifier.issn2048-8505
dc.identifier.pmcPMC8023214
dc.identifier.pmid33841863
dc.identifier.pubmedURLhttps://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8023214/pdf
dc.identifier.unpaywallURLhttps://academic.oup.com/ckj/article-pdf/14/4/1173/38462552/sfaa096.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10668/25754
dc.issue.number4
dc.journal.titleClinical kidney journal
dc.journal.titleabbreviationClin Kidney J
dc.language.isoen
dc.organizationSAS - Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía
dc.organizationSAS - Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía
dc.page.number1173-1180
dc.pubmedtypeJournal Article
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subjectaHUS atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome
dc.subjectaHUS de novo
dc.subjecteculizumab
dc.subjectgenetic study
dc.subjectkidney transplantation recurrence
dc.titleCharacteristics, management and outcomes of atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome in kidney transplant patients: a retrospective national study.
dc.typeresearch article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.volume.number14

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
PMC8023214.pdf
Size:
519.9 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format