Follow-up care over 12 months of patients with prostate cancer in Spain A multicenter prospective cohort study
No Thumbnail Available
Identifiers
Date
2021-11-24
Authors
Bonfill, Xavier
Martinez-Zapata, Maria Jose
Vernooij, Robin W. M.
Sanchez, Maria Jose
Morales-Suarez-Varela, Maria
Emparanza, Jose Ignacio
Ferrer, Montse
Pijoan, Jose Ignacio
Palou, Joan
Madrid, Eva
Advisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Lippincott williams & wilkins
Abstract
The therapeutic approach is crucial to prostate cancer prognosis. We describe treatments and outcomes for a Spanish cohort of patients with prostate cancer during the first 12 months after diagnosis and identify the factors that influenced the treatment they received. This multicenter prospective cohort study included patients with prostate cancer followed up for 12 months after diagnosis. Treatment was stratified by factors such as hospital, age group (= 70 years), and D'Amico cancer risk classification. The outcomes were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, adverse events (AEs), and mortality. The patient characteristics associated with the different treatment modalities were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression. We included 470 men from 7 Spanish tertiary hospitals (mean (standard deviation) age 67.8 (7.6) years), 373 (79.4%) of which received treatment (alone or in combination) as follows: surgery (n = 163; 34.7%); radiotherapy (RT) (n = 149; 31.7%); and hormone therapy (HT) (n = 142; 30.2%). The remaining patients (n = 97) were allocated to no treatment, that is, watchful waiting (14.0%) or active surveillance (5.7%). HT was the most frequently administered treatment during follow-up and RT plus HT was the most common therapeutic combination. Surgery was more frequent in patients aged = 70 with histologic tumor grade 4, and higher ECOG scores. HT was more frequent in patients aged >= 70, with histologic tumor grades 3 to 4, Gleason score >= 8, ECOG >= 1, and higher prostate-specific antigen levels. The number of fully active patients (ECOG score 0) decreased significantly during follow-up, from 75.3% at diagnosis to 65.1% at 12 months (P = 70, with histologic tumor grades 3 to 4, Gleason score >= 8, ECOG >= 1, and higher prostate-specific antigen levels. The number of fully active patients (ECOG score 0) decreased significantly during follow-up, from 75.3% at diagnosis to 65.1% at 12 months (P = 8, ECOG >= 1, and higher prostate-specific antigen levels. The number of fully active patients (ECOG score 0) decreased significantly during follow-up, from 75.3% at diagnosis to 65.1% at 12 months (P = 1, and higher prostate-specific antigen levels. The number of fully active patients (ECOG score 0) decreased significantly during follow-up, from 75.3% at diagnosis to 65.1% at 12 months (P
Description
MeSH Terms
DeCS Terms
CIE Terms
Keywords
hormone therapy, multicenter study, multivariate analysis, prostate cancer, prostatic neoplasms, radiotherapy, surgery