Measuring Spinal Mobility Using an Inertial Measurement Unit System: A Validation Study in Axial Spondyloarthritis.

dc.contributor.authorAranda-Valera, I Concepción
dc.contributor.authorCuesta-Vargas, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorGarrido-Castro, Juan L
dc.contributor.authorGardiner, Philip V
dc.contributor.authorLópez-Medina, Clementina
dc.contributor.authorMachado, Pedro M
dc.contributor.authorCondell, Joan
dc.contributor.authorConnolly, James
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Jonathan M
dc.contributor.authorMuñoz-Esquivel, Karla
dc.contributor.authorO'Dwyer, Tom
dc.contributor.authorCastro-Villegas, M Carmen
dc.contributor.authorGonzález-Navas, Cristina
dc.contributor.authorCollantes-Estévez, Eduardo
dc.contributor.authorOn Behalf Of iMaxSpA Study Group,
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-07T14:28:55Z
dc.date.available2025-01-07T14:28:55Z
dc.date.issued2020-06-24
dc.description.abstractPortable inertial measurement units (IMUs) are beginning to be used in human motion analysis. These devices can be useful for the evaluation of spinal mobility in individuals with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). The objectives of this study were to assess (a) concurrent criterion validity in individuals with axSpA by comparing spinal mobility measured by an IMU sensor-based system vs. optical motion capture as the reference standard; (b) discriminant validity comparing mobility with healthy volunteers; (c) construct validity by comparing mobility results with relevant outcome measures. A total of 70 participants with axSpA and 20 healthy controls were included. Individuals with axSpA completed function and activity questionnaires, and their mobility was measured using conventional metrology for axSpA, an optical motion capture system, and an IMU sensor-based system. The UCOASMI, a metrology index based on measures obtained by motion capture, and the IUCOASMI, the same index using IMU measures, were also calculated. Descriptive and inferential analyses were conducted to show the relationships between outcome measures. There was excellent agreement (ICC > 0.90) between both systems and a significant correlation between the IUCOASMI and conventional metrology (r = 0.91), activity (r = 0.40), function (r = 0.62), quality of life (r = 0.55) and structural change (r = 0.76). This study demonstrates the validity of an IMU system to evaluate spinal mobility in axSpA. These systems are more feasible than optical motion capture systems, and they could be useful in clinical practice.
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/diagnostics10060426
dc.identifier.issn2075-4418
dc.identifier.pmcPMC7344521
dc.identifier.pmid32599741
dc.identifier.pubmedURLhttps://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7344521/pdf
dc.identifier.unpaywallURLhttps://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/10/6/426/pdf?version=1592987330
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10668/26428
dc.issue.number6
dc.journal.titleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
dc.journal.titleabbreviationDiagnostics (Basel)
dc.language.isoen
dc.organizationSAS - Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves
dc.organizationSAS - Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves
dc.pubmedtypeJournal Article
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectaxial spondyloarthritis
dc.subjectinertial measurement unit
dc.subjectspinal mobility
dc.titleMeasuring Spinal Mobility Using an Inertial Measurement Unit System: A Validation Study in Axial Spondyloarthritis.
dc.typeresearch article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.volume.number10

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
PMC7344521.pdf
Size:
732.99 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format