Publication:
Complex Better Than Simple for Distal Left Main Bifurcation Lesions: Lots of Data But Few Crushing Operators.

No Thumbnail Available

Date

2020-06-15

Authors

Pan, Manuel
Ojeda, Soledad

Advisors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Elsevier
Metrics
Google Scholar
Export

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

On the basis of many randomized clinical trials and multiple meta-analyses, a provisional stenting or simple approach has been considered the preferred technique for the percutaneous treatment of bifurcation lesions. This recommendation, established more than 15 years ago, has been maintained in many expert consensus statements and previous clinical guidelines. However, a late-breaking trial presentation during the 2017 Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics meeting (simultaneously published in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology) by Chen et al. appeared to challenge and completely change this long-held belief. Indeed, it was concluded from this randomized clinical trial that “a planned double crush 2-stent strategy resulted in a lower rate of target lesion failure at 1 year compared to a provisional stent strategy in patients with true distal left main bifurcation lesions.” These results were further confirmed in a recent evaluation of clinical outcomes at 3-year follow-up.

Description

MeSH Terms

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary
Coronary Stenosis
Humans
Network Meta-Analysis
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Treatment Outcome

DeCS Terms

Estentado provisional
Lesiones bifurcación
Estrategia de doble stent
Tratamiento percutáneo
Fallo de lesión objetivo
Ensayo clínico aleatorizado

CIE Terms

Keywords

Bifurcation lesions, Coronary stents

Citation

Pan M, Ojeda S. Complex Better Than Simple for Distal Left Main Bifurcation Lesions: Lots of Data But Few Crushing Operators. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jun 22;13(12):1445-1447